Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals; during festival periods, people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Some people argue that we are no longer remember the original meaning of festivals, and that most of us treat them as opportunities to have fun. While I agree that enjoyment seems to be the priority during festival times, I do not agree that people have forgotten what these festivals mean.
On the one hand, religious and traditional festivals certainly become times for celebration. In the UK, Christmas is a good example of a festival period when most people are most concerned with shopping, giving and receiving presents, decorating their homes and enjoying traditional meals with their families. Nonetheless, in this day and age, most people look forward to Christmas as a holiday period rather than a time to practice religion. Similar behaviour can be seen during non-religious festivals, such as Bonfire Night. Many associate this occasion with making fires, watching firework displays, and perhaps going to large events in local parks. In the other words, enjoyment is people’s primary goal.
On the other hand, I side with those who disagree with the idea that the underlying meaning of such festivals has been forgotten. In Vietnam, families play a role in passing knowledge of a variety of religious festivals’ deeper significance on to the next generation. For example, on New Year’s Eve in the Chinese calendar, most parents and their children come back to their hometown, practising ceremonial prays and religious rituals such as making traditional “Chung” cakes. The children are taught in detail about the stories behind these long-standing food and traditional activities on these occasions in Vietnamese people’s conviction.
In conclusion, although people mainly enjoy themselves during the festivals, I believe that they are still aware of the reasons for these celebrations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-13 | zanzendegi | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | phamanhtu | 56 | view |
| 2023-01-29 | adoke | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-15 | yavarmohammadi | 61 | view |
| 2022-10-26 | khanhkhanhkhanhkhanhkhanh | 73 | view |
- Some people think that it is good for a country s culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes Others think that it is better to produce these locally Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothers go out to work What could be the reason for this Do you think it is a positive or a negative development 67
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extend do you agree or disagree with this view 78
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 369, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[7]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: ''.
...s day and age, most people look forward to Christmas as a holiday period rather than a time ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 528, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun associate seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many associates'.
Suggestion: Many associates
...gious festivals, such as Bonfire Night. Many associate this occasion with making fires, watchi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, nonetheless, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39084507042 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91646875893 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602112676056 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6577599059 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.769230769 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.450394952222 0.244688304435 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139082546847 0.084324248473 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0952461006837 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250534241625 0.151304729494 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0922369170262 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.