A major initiative to save wildlife is being observed in recent years. Leveraging money on saving animals or concentrating on other problems in a country is always debatable. This essay will argue why a fixed amount should be invested for the wild inhabitants while the major focus of a government should be on taking care of important problems regarding the people.
Protecting wild creatures is always important, though there are other concerns in the society. Being a part of nature, government officials should focus on protecting the wild. Since deforestations are rampant in our society, it is high time that concerns regarding inhabitants of the forest should not be ignored. According to a survey, many wild creatures are killed by village people settled near the forests. Similarly, many villagers are also consumed by wildlife as their daily food. Since human beings are supposing to live in harmony with nature and its constituents, the government should give top priority for the well being and preservation of the wild in order to maintain stability in nature.
Being a country of such a huge population, it should be the prime focus to protect concerns related to the people of the country and not to wildlife. Solving poverty problems being the topmost priority, there are other aspects that need to be taken care such as corruption, human welfare, etc. Since, millions of farmers and labor workers die of poverty every year, the administration should take proper steps to prevent that. Although, taking care of wildlife is important, but masses who elected a government must have the right of getting importance than anyone else.
Protecting and thinking about the welfare of forest creatures are increasing nowadays. This essay argued that although, it is the wildlife who need a helping hand from the government, but being a part of a developing country, I strong agree that concerns related to common people have to be addressed first.
- Last month you had a holiday overseas where you stayed with some friends. They have just sent you some photos of your holiday.Write a letter to your friends. In your letter:•thank them for the photos and for the holiday•explain why you didn't write ea 73
- It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important? Do you agree or disagree? 56
- It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important? Do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtant problems regarding the people. Protecting wild creatures is always impo...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 510, Rule ID: NON_ACTION_CONTINUOUS[4]
Message: The verb suppose is usually not used with a continuous form, use the simple form instead. Suggestion: 'suppose'
Suggestion: suppose
...as their daily food. Since human beings are supposing to live in harmony with nature and its ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 510, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...as their daily food. Since human beings are supposing to live in harmony with nature and its ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...der to maintain stability in nature. Being a country of such a huge populatio...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...getting importance than anyone else. Protecting and thinking about the welfar...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, similarly, so, well, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.175 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77421159972 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53125 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4367883492 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.4 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53333333333 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112711733772 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432288268953 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394347697048 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0750116589524 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308657926828 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.