It is often said that governments spent too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important ?
Do you agree or disagree ?
Although, it is universally acknowledged that higher authorities of states reserve most part of monetary budget on rescuing undomesticated animals, whereas, it is always debatable that there are many prominent concerns that should not be overlooked. However, I completely disagree with the statement because natural fauna is component of ecosystem and serves as a huge source of revenue for countries.
Firstly, fauna is as important as humans are in this planet and comprises a great part of eco-system. Nowadays, many universal problems we are facing more or less related to interference in the eco-system. State has started several projects under ministry of environment to protect the endangered species. For example, many environmentalists have been studying from decades about the disturbance in ecosystem and conclude that any addition or destruction of animal from ecosystem results in biodiversity loss and global warming exacerbation. In other words, it eventually save us from further haphazard that occur as a consequence.
Secondly, initiatives by several governments to spend money for protecting wildlife animals brings more prosperity to the society in return as compared to investment. For instance, In USA, California theme Park is most famous the world over and statistics depict that government spare around 10 billion dollars as maintenance and development fund and generate almost 22 billion dollars perennially. Furthermore, it begets benefits in terms of providing natural habitat to extincting animals and employment opportunities for the local public.
To conclude, many people moan on allocating budget for save wildlife, reasoning that this could be spent on many other issues encountered these days but these project save our planet from many other problems and augment monetary status of the local government and public.
- In many countries the government prioritizes economic growth above all other concerns Discuss the advantages and disadvantages and give your own opinion 64
- In many countries, the quality of life in the large cities is becoming worse.What causes this problem?What measure can be taken to solve it? 84
- Some people think that the government should be responsible for crime prevention, while other believe that it is the responsibility of the individual to protect themselves.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years 47
- Write a letter to the restaurant's manager. In your letter,Explain that you would like to apply for the job.Give some details of any relevent experience that you have.specify days and times that would suit you. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 573, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'saves'?
Suggestion: saves
...erbation. In other words, it eventually save us from further haphazard that occur as...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, whereas, for example, for instance, in other words, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68817204301 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10479099717 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637992831541 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.878908185 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.272727273 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3636363636 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6363636364 7.06120827912 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144017745574 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490250864902 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046315993958 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0785058480988 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414610179209 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.65 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.