A large number of people are being killed in road accidents every year.
Why do so many accidents occur? Make recommendations that would help to reduce the number of road accidents
With the advancement of technology, vehicles are used by many people in daily commute. It has led to numerous of accidents which is reported almost every day. All these serious accident causes should be solved by the government as well as individuals.
There are many reasons of accidents related to happen on the roads but the prominent one would be reckless driving. People do not follow the driving rules while they are on the roads. Cars and bikes are the main source for road accidents because it seems that drivers have obtained the road permits illegally or by the bribe to driving institute. Moreover, the conditions of the roads are deteriorated every day because of the heavy vehicles on the road. It causes many number of the pit and puddles. Therefore, driver could not handle their cars which end up with collision to other cars or person. According to The Times, death of people by car incidents have been increased by 2 percent as compare to last year only in London city.
Every problems have a solution, so it could be rectified by the Government. They should invest huge amount of money to build proper road infrastructure, specially in the cities. If the roads are equipped with the high tech signals and leveled in the same way all over the way then it will help to reduce the serious accidents on the roads. Addition to that, individuals have also play there role with authorities. The trafic rules should be strictly imposed by the authorities so driver would drive their vehicle in proper way. For example, in Karachi city, the car accidents were declined after the mayor double the price the road tickets.
In conclusion, mismanagement of authority and improper driving of individuals are the main factors of the road accidents that could be avoid with the good rules with the forcefully implementation to everyone and also fixing and repairing of the road could be help full for saving the life on roads.
- Many people think that more having more money will make them happier How important is money to happiness 90
- Some people think that advances in technology are beneficial for worker. Other say it is a disadvantage. Discuss and give you own opinion. 89
- Q.1Work is being done on the street where you live. The noise is disturbing you. Write a letter of complaint to your local council. In your letter:•Introduce yourself•Explain what the problems is•Suggest solutions to the problemYou do not need to wr 64
- Stores should sell local food products and not the imported food products Do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people are of the opinion that being highly qualified is the only way to ensure a well paying job While others believe that having work experience is the best way to get a well paying job Discuss both views and give your opinion 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 465, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'many numbers'.
Suggestion: many numbers
...e heavy vehicles on the road. It causes many number of the pit and puddles. Therefore, driv...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 735, Rule ID: EACH_EVERY_NNS[1]
Message: 'Each' and 'every' are used with singular. Did you mean 'all'?
Suggestion: All
...mpare to last year only in London city. Every problems have a solution, so it could b...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'played'.
Suggestion: played
...Addition to that, individuals have also play there role with authorities. The trafic...
^^^^
Line 4, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...help full for saving the life on roads.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82831325301 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60113164459 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53313253012 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5675965421 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2941176471 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5294117647 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52941176471 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360360766929 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108543841667 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065567048841 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216322979316 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439082594116 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.