The main purpose of public libraries is to provide books and they shouldn’t waste their limited resources and spaces on providing expensive hi-tech media such as computer software, videos and DVDs. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Some people think libraries should provide only books and should not spend anything on virtual resources, such as videos and DVDs. I partially agree with this thought because libraries have limited resources of fundings, and should invest only on books, but educational videos are an essential part of learning that help in understanding a topic much better.
Libraries should invest only on books and utilise their spaces only for books as they have limited resources. People come to libraries to either study or collect books and are not charged for the same. Libraries are required to provide a clean environment to the readers and vast availability of books. Due to that, the government spends money on arranging new books and maintaining libraries from their budget. Therefore, libraries should not waste money on an expensive hi-tech media to cut-down the libraries’ expenses. For example, Norway spends approximately $100,000 on libraries for their maintenance and importing all kinds of books for children and adults.
Virtual learning plays a vital role in understanding of a particular topic. Intructor-led videos help people in better and in-depth understanding of a specific topic. Not only instructor-led videos but also documentaries contribute towards individuals’ knowledge of a lesson. Moreover, sometimes people have less time, due to which they prefer to watch videos to learn the lesson quickly they are looking for. Consequently, libraries should make such online platforms available for people, so that they can have virtual understanding, along with theortical knowledge. To illustrate, in the US, libraries provide laptops which can be accessed by anyone to watch videos or attend online sessions.
To conclude, libraries should spend money wisely as they do not have enough resources; however, providing educational DVDs and others sources in libraries is significant for the growth and development of readers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-22 | Chirag Bhardwaj | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-22 | Chirag Bhardwaj | 73 | view |
- With access to the internet and social media websites many children are exposed to a number of dangerous situations Adults should thus limit access to the internet for their children Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people believe they should keep all the money they have earned and should not pay tax to the state Do you agree or disagree 73
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth rather than for their achievements and this sets a bad example to young people To What extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that teaching methodology in the modern classroom should be based on experiential learning while others believe that traditional approach is still the best To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinion 78
- What are the merits and demerits of globalization on developing nations 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'medium'?
Suggestion: medium
...not waste money on an expensive hi-tech media to cut-down the libraries’ expenses. Fo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53355704698 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97443614711 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546979865772 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.4510912919 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.785714286 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265842640062 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919173509204 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05935132905 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168107911721 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418863550068 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.