Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree?
It is true that many people suppose that repairing public libraries is not need this is because the internet can afford to replace it. I think that the public library is vital for our life besides using the internet.
On the one hand, we cannot deny that the internet can replace some of functions of library and it has also many benefits. Firstly, without have waste time travelling to library this means that person who want to read something or look for information can stay at home or where have the internet connection in order to do this thing. Furthermore, using the internet instead of coming to library might help readers to quickly collect a range of knowledge in terms of fields they concern. This is because readers do not need to spend more time on finding books and read page by page to look for information.
On the other hand, there are also several reasons for maintaining public libraries. The first reason is that public library is an ordinary place for gathering people of community. In which besides reading book, people can see and talk each other and enhance their relationship. As a result, people in community will become more closer and frequently help each other if anyone has difficult issue. Moreover Public library is also very good place reading books for people who do not know how to use internet especially elders. For instance, my father, he is 80 years old, he does know the internet so he usually comes to library of our community to read books and see his friend and I recognize that he always feel over the moon after coming this area.
In conclusion, although the internet can take some responsibility of library, I strongly believe that repairing public libraries is not waste money and it is very necessary for our life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-14 | davidlvg1108 | 90 | view |
| 2019-01-14 | hoangquang | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-14 | hoangquang | 61 | view |
| 2019-01-13 | hoangquang | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-13 | hoangquang | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'needed'.
Suggestion: needed
... that repairing public libraries is not need this is because the internet can afford...
^^^^
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or our life besides using the internet. On the one hand, we cannot deny that the...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the functions') or simply say ''some functions''.
Suggestion: some of the functions; some functions
...nnot deny that the internet can replace some of functions of library and it has also many benefit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'closer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: closer
...result, people in community will become more closer and frequently help each other if anyon...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 398, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ch other if anyone has difficult issue. Moreover Public library is also very good place ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and it is very necessary for our life.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75324675325 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47379587845 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525974025974 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8185031527 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.615384615 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3846153846 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191368666764 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798066249466 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470167526614 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138010557856 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243210769253 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.