Nowadays a great quantity of people read on electronic devices, such as laptop and kindle, rather than read books due to the advancement of digital technology. Therefore, some people assert that it is a waste of time and money to maintain public libraries because of the popularity of e-book. However, I utterly disagree this view.
To begin with, digital technology substantially changed the way that many people read books. With the convenience derived from digital technology and abundant choice from internet, numerious people form the habit of reading e-book other than reading printed books. The trend is revealed by the sale of kindle from Amazon, which sold 16 million devices in 2016. Nonetheless, this phenomenon does not imply that nobody reads books made from paper and borrows books from public library.
As a matter of fact, public library is still a prime destination for majority people to read and borrow books. The Brisbane Square Library, for example, opens seven days in a week and is nearly crowed with readers every day. One main reason is that most people enjoy the form of reading a printed book that readers can use a bookmark to remind the reading progress. Another reason is that public libraries arrange books according to subject that is easy to choose for each reader's perference. In addition, watching e-books on electronic devices would easily result in fatigue of eyes, which is the reason that eldsters and near sighted people prefer to read printed books.
To recapitulate, digital technology truly changed the reading habit of a proportion of people; nonetheless, a majority of readers stick the habit of reading books made from paper. Thus, maintainence on public libraries is not a waste of time.
- Some people believe that sport competitions are a source of emotional stress for young people Therefore youth should be banned from participating in sport competitions Do you agree or disagree 86
- With an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging face to face communication will become a thing of the past To what extent do you agree 75
- The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors - agriculture, manufacturing, and business and financial services - to the UK economy in the twentieth centrury.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compar 91
- Modern forms of communication such as email and messaging have reduced the amount of time people spend seeing their friends. This has had a negative effect on their social lives.What extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and includ 67
- The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999, and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowadays a great quantity of people read...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wever, I utterly disagree this view. To begin with, digital technology substa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d borrows books from public library. As a matter of fact, public library is s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people prefer to read printed books. To recapitulate, digital technology trul...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, nonetheless, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, such as, as a matter of fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12631578947 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57539079262 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536842105263 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7175437293 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.357142857 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129319765256 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693120428519 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903955033515 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109486701607 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588833359686 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.