The bar chart compares the major exportation in three categories, meat products, dairy products and international tourism, between 2005 and 2015, and predicts the prosperation of 2025 in Someland.
Overall, exportation of dairy products and overseas tourism increased over the span of ten years. The prediction of 2025 indicates an expend in international tourism and declinds in both meat and dairy products.
It is apparent that the exportation of dairy products raised dramatically from approximately 5 billion dollors in 2005 to almost 8 billion dollors in 2015. However, the projection implies a slight decline in the year of 2025 when compared to that in 2015. By contrast, the exportation of meat products decreased moderately from 4 billion dollars in 2005 to over 3 billion dollors in 2015. The prediction of 2025 infers a further decrease to about 3 billion dollors.
Turning to the category of international tourism, it is encouring to witness a general increase from over 6 billion dollors in 2005 to nearly 7 billion dollors in 2015. Besides, the prediction of 2025 is also promising, which predicts a continuous increase to almost 8 billion dollors of exportation.
- General Writing Task 1 Essay topic You have seen an advertisement for a weekend job as a local tour guide showing visitors around your city Write a letter of application to the tourism office In the letter give your reasons for wanting the job explain why 77
- The diagram below gives information about the number of parcels delivered by two major mail services companies from 1920 to 2000 87
- Nowadays for many people the Internet is replacing regular books What do you think will happen in the future and what is your opinion about this trend 82
- The table below shows the water usage for different purposes in six different countries in 2001. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- IN some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing school and starting university studies. Discuss advantages and disadvantages for young people who decided to do this. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...years. The prediction of 2025 indicates an expend in international tourism and declinds i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 202, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...n 2015. Besides, the prediction of 2025 is also promising, which predicts a continuous increase t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, so, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28571428571 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09348749844 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47619047619 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0308509783 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112074053136 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05934250809 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338546996604 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0769352884471 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423599923768 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.