Many companies sponsor sports as a way of advertising themselves.
Some people think that this is a good thing, while others think that it has disadvantages. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In this globalized ion, there is a colossal upsurge in the trend to see the prodigies discussing that, it is good for several multinational companies to advertise themselves by sponsoring sports events. Whilst, others coincide that there are some downsides to this. Thereby, I agree with the former viewpoint, and in this essay, I shall explain both sides of the argument by analysing it.
On the one hand, compelling pieces of evidence are obtainable to prove that both the parties are equally profitable. Firstly, the well-renowned player or team could probably consist of major fan followers. Since, the company logo, name, or product will be a part of that event, it reaches directly to the audience and through media. For instance, in the world cup, the player's costume would be filled with the sponsor's name and logo. Secondly, the player can concentrate completely on the game than financial worries, where the company could take care of all their needs. As a result, the success bred by players begets the profit of their supporter companies.
On the flip side, people across board discriminates that, there are some disadvantages. First, as per the aforementioned viewpoints, the company's reputation is highly connected with the player's success, while simple failure would be a massive pitfall for their sponsor's reputation. Furthermore, due to increased competition in the global market, there is a possibility to bribe the player for match-fixing. For example, in the 2016 World cup, two Australian cricketers are banned for such an incident. However, these are the minor possibilities which could be resolved by following rules and rigour practise.
In conclusion, sponsoring sports benefits both the organisation as well as players and teams. Ergo its contrary can be overlooked or curbed. Consequently, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
- Some people think that the only way to judge someone’s success in business is by the amount of money they make. Is this a true indicator of the success of a business and in what other ways could success in a business be measured? 84
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets, many small local businesses are unable to compete. Some people think that the closure of local business will bring about the death of local communities. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Some people think money is the best gift to give youngsters, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Some people believe that natural ability is necessary to be successful at sports. Others believe that hard work and practice is more important. Discuss both sides and add your own opinion. 61
- The claim that animals have rights has been subjected as a matter of debate since the 1970’s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 411, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sponsors'' or 'sponsor's'?
Suggestion: sponsors'; sponsor's
...layers costume would be filled with the sponsors name and logo. Secondly, the player can...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 187, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'players'' or 'player's'?
Suggestion: players'; player's
...reputation is highly connected with the players success, while simple failure would be ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 65, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...g sports benefits both the organisation as well as players and teams. Ergo its contrary ca...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, look, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37755102041 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00655838266 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622448979592 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6817337414 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2941176471 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.29411764706 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159581887558 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494163223811 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551533373364 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106442514358 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669431238858 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.