in many countries, paying for things using mobile phone (cell phone) apps is becoming increasingly common.
Does this development have more advantages or more disadvantages?
Nowadays, e-payment once a thing for rich people has now become more. Needless to say, the use of digital devices for payments has surged drastically within a short time span. This essay will discuss the positive and negative aspects of using mobile phones as a tool for paying bills.
There are many advantages contributing to the popularity of this trend. Handy gadgets has made purchasing hassle free. Clearly, with the invent of mobile applications like, Paytm and Google pay, the need to carry physical cash for buying goods is obsolete. In addition, the constant fear of loosing money while carrying hard cash is also eliminated by adapting this trend. Moreover, these apps also provide lucrative cashbacks and discounts that encourage users to opt for online payment. Also, keeping a tab on monthly expenses has becomes simple as a person can view history of his spendings through these apps on their cell phones.
On the contrary, there are certain drawbacks to this mode of payment. The number of cyber thefts is skyrocketing each year, owing to the popularity of digital money. Certainly, there are cyber crime divisions established by the government but, there are still many unresolved cyber thefts which puts a question mark on how much safe it is to use these mere phone apps for transferring huge funds to some unknown merchandise. Another drawback is an unaccountable shopping. When a person is not bound with a fixed amount of cash and is free to make purchase with facility of online payment, the expenditure increase to a greater extent, which in turn contribute to unneccesary money loss.
To sum up, it can be reiterated, increasing use of mobiles for payments has gained popularity and in my opinion the merits of this development outweighs the demerits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-15 | yasaman-pooshidani | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-11 | minhhh123 | 84 | view |
| 2022-02-09 | bilal_chaudhry | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-23 | shadow1222 | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-10 | ernchawla | 84 | view |
- Some people argue that sports are essential for us Others think of sports as an activity for leisure time Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people think that spending a lot on holding wedding parties birthday parties and other celebrations is just a waste of money Others however think that these are necessary for individuals and the society Discuss 61
- You ordered a new cheque book from your bank two weeks ago but you have received nothing Write a letter to the manager complaining about the bad service Say when and how you ordered the cheque book Ask how much longer you will have to wait and ask the man 78
- Some people believe that celebrating personal events is a waste of money Others feel that these celebrations play an important role in the lives of individuals and in society as a whole Discuss both views and give your own opinion 90
- Some feel that governments should prioritize healthcare instead of other important areas To what extent do you agree or disagree 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 133, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e purchasing hassle free. Clearly, with the invent of mobile applications like, Paytm and ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, so, still, while, in addition, in my opinion, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03389830508 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69836470422 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633898305085 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9637434571 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280115276317 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795212650138 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701390968063 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165177849572 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649224099124 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.