In many countries, people like to eat a wider variety of food from other regions more than local food. As a result, much of the food has to come from other regions. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh its disadvantages?
People like to explore new tastes especially the youngsters, and eating “foreign” food becomes a new trend in many countries. Consequently, imported food occupies a significant portion of total nutrition. This phenomenon sparks society’s concern about its pros and cons. I personally believe the benefits of people eating regional food outweigh the loss incurred.
It is true that local food usually is fresher than regional food because of the less time of transportation. Importing food from other countries might take a few days while local food could be delivered to a household in a day. The food suppliers sometimes apply chemical additive to conservative its freshness. In addition, eating regional food usually means higher cost because of the additional transportation fees. The prices of the food can be a big difference between made in locally and overseas.
On the flip side, regional food provides the local community with a wider variety of nutrition. Geographic as the vital factor that limits the countries production of specified food. Singapore, an island country, needs to importing food globally due to its insufficient farmlands. People are able to taste more species of food by worldwide food trade. Exporting food could also provide inland regions with more wealth. Some inland regions due to its geographical limitation are far behind developed than megacities. Farmers earn money from farming and food export.
To conclude, eating regional food makes people more choices of nutrition and bring farmers more business while chemical applied to food might be a risk to people’s health. However, the government could take more stringent measures to ensure food is healthy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-19 | parabshreyas | 78 | view |
| 2019-04-23 | Oscar.K | 87 | view |
- Some people believe famous people's support towards international aid organizations draws the attention to problems. While others think celebrities make the problems less important. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 90
- Some people prefer to live in a house, while others feel that there are more advantages to living in an apartment. Are there more advantages than disadvantages of living in a house compared with living in an apartment?Give reasons for your answer and incl 73
- You are going to another country to study. You would like to do a part-time job while you are studying, so you want to ask a friend who lives there for some help. Write a letter to this friend. In your letter - Give details of your study plans - Explain w 73
- The idea of having a single career is becoming an old fashioned one. The new fashion mil be to have several careers or ways of earning money and further education will be something that continues throughout life. 11
- Tourism has caused environmental problems in many parts of the world What sort of problems has been caused and what can be done about them 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...hic as the vital factor that limits the countries production of specified food. Singapore...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 567, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arn money from farming and food export. To conclude, eating regional food makes ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent measures to ensure food is healthy.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, so, while, in addition, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48496240602 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00955992767 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597744360902 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9015575476 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.0555555556 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7777777778 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72222222222 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.492299743441 0.244688304435 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157491625208 0.084324248473 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624480655521 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295919418378 0.151304729494 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409913958176 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.91 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.