In many countries plastic bags are the main source of rubbish causing pollution in oceans and on land; therefore they should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In these recent years, oceanic life, as well as other animals are in danger due to the heavy usage of plastic bags in the modern countries. Therefore, it is necessary to ban the usage of plastic bags in the daily usage activities. In this, we will discuss the effects of plastic usage and methods to minimize the usage of the plastic.
Firstly, due to the industrial revolution, usage of plastic has become inevitable for different reasons like wrapping, packaging and so on. Especially, Plastic bags got popularity due to its low cost compared to the other biodegradable or reusable materials. This economical difference had a huge impact on the overall usage of the plastic bags in the present scenario. Due to this significant usage, the remnants of plastics are collected in oceans and wastelands that leads to the pollution of water and air. For example, according to the report of National Geographical channel, the pollution in the Hindu pacific ocean is due to the accumulation of the plastics in the ocean. This waste is dumped by the passenger ships and transport ships.
Secondly, the plastic material which is accumulated is not degradable by the environment. This accumulation leads to the decrease in the aquatic life and other living organisms. The aquatic life like fish, penguins, dolphins and other animals consumes this plastic material by thinking of food materials. After ingestion of the plastic, they are unable to digest the swallowed, subsequently leads to the death of the animals. According to the report of World Oceanic life studies, 60% of the death of aquatic life is due to the presence of plastic materials in the oceans and land.
Thirdly, there are many unequivocal and ubiquitous examples for these plastic product as these do not decay with time. Upon burning, these cause some peril danger which cause cancer with damaging of respiratory system. Scientist has not discovered any enzyme which can recycle these plastic materials. If it is intake into any living species, it could choke respiratory tubes. For example, due to this we have bad air quality and ocean water is also opaqued to higher extent.
In recapitulate, while there are strong lucid evidences, in my personal view we should stop this plastic involvement in wrapping or packaging. I would strongly recommend that regime must campaign bad influence of plastic which exits in our environment and should collect on priority basis from all dustbin debris.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-03 | sdhbti | 61 | view |
| 2019-04-22 | gillmandeep0260 | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-16 | Glenn20sal | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-01 | Mafijur | 73 | view |
| 2018-04-30 | maryam2 | 73 | view |
- Nowadays the importance of teachers is diminishing due to increased availability of alternative sources to students To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 73
- School teachers are more responsible for social and intellectual development of students than parents. 61
- School teachers are more responsible for social and intellectual development of students than parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- School teachers are more responsible for the social and intellectual development of students than parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Nowadays the importance of teachers is diminishing due to increased availability of alternative sources to students. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, well, while, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2066.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 404.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11386138614 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74766300607 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519801980198 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 662.4 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.4891501628 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.380952381 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2380952381 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222116143812 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682832424493 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321084686463 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119172063771 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024504562329 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.