Nowadays, plastic has become an indispensable material. Plastic brings convenience to people, on the other hand, it is causing tremendous damage to the environment. That is because it does not rot, which is the fatal disadvantage of plastic. Therefore, I think that plastic has more disadvantages than advantages. I will tell you three reasons to support my opinion.
To begin with, plastic waste causes terrible damage to animals. Plastic waste does not rot easily, so most of it flows into the sea if it is thrown on the ground carelessly. Many animals mistake this plastic for food, so they are suffering. For example, many sea turtles mistake plastic for food and die a lot. Not only marine animals, but also camels living in the desert did not have much food, so they ate a lot of plastic and were very sick. It is also said that several marine animals were hit by plastic debris, resulting in amputation of their arms and legs or large cuts to their faces. So for animals, plastic is just a disaster.
Next, plastic has a huge amount of trash. Plastic varies from type to type, but studies show that the fastest rotting speed is hundred years. This perishable plastic builds up, making the amount of waste huge as well as unaffordable. Therefore, the garbage island, which is the place to throw away trash, has been filled up and is gradually flowing into the sea. Eventually, this hurts animals and the vicious cycle repeats itself. Also, in a news report, an expert said that in the next fifty years, trash will occupy half of the continent.
Last, plastic is supposed to end up hurting people. As mentioned earlier, when animals eat plastic, people eat it. This naturally builds up microplastics in the human body. These piles of plastic do not decay in the body, so it causes various diseases or dies when it gets worse. Also, not only will waste reduce the area of land that people can live in, but the air will also be polluted, forcing them to live in increasingly dirty conditions. For instance, even now many developed countries sell their own trash to developing countries.
This is why I think plastics have more disadvantages than advantages. Plastic made for people’s convenience harms animals, amplifies the amount of waste and eventually harms people. Thus, we must work to reduce the use of plastics and develop rotting plastics in the future.
- As you read the passage below consider how Paul Bogard uses evidence such as facts or examples to support claims reasoning to develop ideas and to connect claims and evidence stylistic or persuasive elements such as w 73
- 59 Some people are always in a hurry to go places and get things done Other people prefer to take their time and live life at a slower pace Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 100
- your job has more effect on your happiness than your social life does. 60
- Hail pieces of ice that form and fall from clouds instead of snow or rain has always been a problem for farmers in some areas of the United States Hail pellets can fall with great force and destroy crops in the field Over the last few decades a met 77
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
... show that the fastest rotting speed is hundred years. This perishable plastic builds u...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, i think, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1977.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 407.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85749385749 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55987349822 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555282555283 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 16.0721442886 168% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0454923546 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.2222222222 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0740740741 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.51851851852 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 3.9879759519 376% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214089977439 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654047444319 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699184565301 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129571263706 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630009373294 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.0946893788 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.