In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level. Discuss both views and give your opinion?

Nowadays, people are very conscious in choosing their carriers as many countries prefer giving high salaries to employees who have more of professional knowledge. Some people are of the view that this approach is positive for the country while other believes that there should be standard set of the salaries.In my view point it is important to have parity of income among individuals to have comfortable standard of living and economic growth, and this article will discuss in details both the view points.

Many countries are of the viewpoint that people with more of professional knowledge like doctor, scientists, financial analyst should be paid higher salaries so that they can retain the talent in their respective countries. They are conscious if the professional talent is not paid well people might leave the country and shift to other countries ultimately leading to brain drain. In order to avoid such circumstances countries pay more to individuals with high domain knowledge in professional services to boost their own economy and develop further.

In doing so countries forget about the people with skill based knowledge like plumbers, electricians and labors. Government should understand the skills of the people are also important in the development of any economy and by promoting them the government is actually initiating the development from micro level. The salary of skilled labor should get increased so that they feel their need in the country along with the job security, by doing these people gets motivated and work better.

In my opinion it is important for any country to maintain parity of income among individuals so that they grow individually along with the economy. Government should take steps to move the lower level of income generating group towards high income generating bracket so people feel motivated and serve their own country. A very important point to note is development and GDP growth at macro level can be achieved when small and micro level issues are catered and resolved.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 310, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... should be standard set of the salaries.In my view point it is important to have p...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, if, so, well, while, in my opinion, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22629969419 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70363027456 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507645259939 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.7156036882 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.363636364 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7272727273 20.7667163134 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257099563701 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964131374282 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577510199971 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159073100952 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651316286368 0.056905535591 114% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.65 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.