Many employers find that their new employees lack sufficient interpersonal skills such as lack of ability to work with colleagues as a team. What are the causes? Can you suggest some possible solutions?
Newly recruited workers seem to lack fundamental interpersonal skills such as cooperation ability. Rationales for such deficiency include their inexperience and insufficient soft skill training from their former institutions. There is a need for companies and tertiary education to tailor their skill training courses.
Workers who are lacking in interpersonal skills can be due to their limited exposure to practical working situations. It is reasonable that they, employees, may not have had the opportunities to collaborate effectively with their former colleagues or clients in their previous jobs. This contributes to the insufficient ability to navigate the demands of a professional work environment where interpersonal skills are essential. The lack of experience and exposure to practical situations where they can exercise their interpersonal skills can be a significant hindrance to the development of these skills in newly-hired workers. Lessons in these schools may have more emphasis on theoretical knowledge, not on soft skills, which will create a working-stimulated environment where employees can familiarize themselves with current working conditions.
There are some viable solutions that can be implemented by companies and universities to address the problem. Companies can change their working conditions by integrating more group-focused activities allowing colleagues to collaborate with others. Not only will this help to train newly hired workers the ability to work cooperatively, but this is also a great way to build strong bonds among workers. Moreover, tertiary institutions need to tailor their syllabus, incorporating more workshops and lessons specializing in job-related skills. Making these activities a compulsory part of students’ curriculum will help them, undergraduates, pay more attention and effectively learn more from these lessons.
In conclusion, the lack of interpersonal skills stems from insufficient work experience and improper training in the employees’ education system. This shortcoming can be deterred by having soft skill training courses prior to practical working conditions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 73 | view |
- Directors of large organizations receive much higher salaries than ordinary workers Some think it is necessary while others think it is unfair Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 73
- Many employers find that their new employees lack sufficient interpersonal skills such as lack of ability to work with colleagues as a team What are the causes Can you suggest some possible solutions 73
- More and more countries are making university education completely free for their citizens What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 67
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The table below shows local catches and imports of fresh fish into Perth Australia for the years 2004 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rel 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1846.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 6.05245901639 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4116420186 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531147540984 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7675455306 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.066666667 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73333333333 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29640585397 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11092283856 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061183458546 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18692634802 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566573714096 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.81 12.4159519038 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.