Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones.
How important is it to maintain old buildings?
Should history stand in the way of progress?
It is true that government secure the ancient structures because it is one of the physical forms of national antiquity. Although it is argued that those buildings should be demolished and restore with modern building, I believe that retain these relics and development of country are not opposite, because they have significant role on both economy and education.
Preserving historic building has great influence on local economical growth and study of history. On the one hand, as a country heritage lot of traveller could be gathered to visit artefact which means local people run multitude business in that area. For example, when we visit in Tajmohol in india, apparently see that lot of hotels and other business established only for tourist interest. On the other hand, history is the thing which is not only improved by reading but also watching it with the eyes. The students of history could improve their knowledge and analyse the past event by witness the real formation.
People have to be familiar with their ancestor living culture, trend not only by reading but also with realistic frame. In present day, modernized infrastructure can demonstrate the nation’s prosperity, but government could use those remarkable establishment by renovate them rather than destroy. For instance, the old port city penang in Malaysia most antique buildings are refurbish and utilize as shop, museum, office etc.
In conclusion, keeping historic building is economically and educationally prolific for nation, and I believe that history and national advancement should be placed side by side on same pathway.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...c building has great influence on local economical growth and study of history. On the one...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he old port city penang in Malaysia most antique buildings are refurbish and util...
^^
Line 5, column 382, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'refurbished'.
Suggestion: refurbished
...in Malaysia most antique buildings are refurbish and utilize as shop, museum, office etc...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36470588235 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82185135321 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61568627451 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.082759863 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.363636364 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177855690138 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592552555455 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046205497176 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109651424723 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350080505438 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.