Many people believe that social networking sites have had had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. To what extent do you agree?

It is argued that most of the people accept social applications has huge impacts and influence the people individually and globally. Social applications such as Facebook, Whatsapp et Cetera playing a vital role in society and it has made the most essential thing in everyone's life. However, it has more pros but some applications driving them in a negative way. In this essay, I partially agree that what are the implications of using social applications by the people socially as well as an individual and how to use them in a proper way in order to get rid of issues.

To start with, many applications invented for having a connection with family, friends and making a relationship with diverse people. In addition to that, it has many features such as video and audio calling, live chat and sending friend requests on a push of one button. To exemplify, people who work in abroad, they can use them to make face to face conversation efficiently and effectively over the air. Moreover, most applications are free and cost-effective. So many people can use them for their personal purpose.

On the flip side, according to the report which is unveiled by the best news company, it says 92% of the students occupied by social media. As a consequence, they are not concentrating on their studies so it leads them to fail in their exam. For instance, people want to complete their assignments in some period of time, as these applications occupies more time and reduce the pace of their regular work.

To conclude, now most of the companies offering and developing applications that are only focusing on how to impulse people globally. The main reason is, with that connect people together, promote good products as an advertisement and sometimes politicians used this as a weapon to reach and disseminate their thoughts to the people. So, even social applications influence people in the wrong way however everyone should perceive how to make use of them.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 344, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...pros but some applications driving them in a negative way. In this essay, I partially agree that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 524, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ll as an individual and how to use them in a proper way in order to get rid of issues. To st...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...t to complete their assignments in some period of time, as these applications occupies more ti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, well, even so, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as, to start with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93051359517 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88411583506 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549848942598 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3485012197 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.8 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140297933527 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507804341297 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554814683604 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0848711122391 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580929137418 0.056905535591 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.