Social networking sites interduce adverse effect on people and community level in alot of amount as per majority of individuals. However, i completely disagree as along with negative impact of social networking sites, these sites equally advantageous for persons and society level.
Considering the adverse effects of social networking sites , the predominant is that people make fake relationship on these sites. Instagram, for example, many boys and girls make fake id , they use wrong for earning money, somtime girls take money from boys with the help of emtional blackmail. Apart from this, individuals loss the skill of face to face communication as they normally talk with friends and relatives on internet. On that time, they do not have fear regarding any kind of things as they do not watch each other. When individuals meet face to face, they do not feel comfortable. Also, masses speak lie on these sites whether they talk with friends or family members , which results the week bonding between each other.
Despite above written negative impact of social networking site, there are distinct advantages on both level either individuals or community, the primary one is that these sites are faster for communication as compare to past. For instance, persons who live in oversea countries, they communicate with their family member within seconds. They do not feel alone as with the help of viedo chat, they see each other without any ristiction. In addition to this, these sites save the time and money of individuals as people when they went to their relative home. There is a need of money for travel and it consume time, but ,in thesedays, individuals onlu go to their relative home when they have very important work, otherwise they communicate on social networking sites.
In conclusion, although social networking sites have adverse effect but these sites are benefical for communication with those people who live in abroad, also save time as well as money.
- Many people believe that social networking sites such as Facebook have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society To what extent do you agree 67
- Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy Which opinion do you agree with Discuss both options and give examples 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...verse effects of social networking sites , the predominant is that people make fak...
^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...xample, many boys and girls make fake id , they use wrong for earning money, somti...
^^
Line 3, column 683, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...they talk with friends or family members , which results the week bonding between ...
^^
Line 5, column 602, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'consumes'?
Suggestion: consumes
...re is a need of money for travel and it consume time, but ,in thesedays, individuals on...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 619, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...oney for travel and it consume time, but ,in thesedays, individuals onlu go to the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, regarding, second, so, well, apart from, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15527950311 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64247687287 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524844720497 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9292845199 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.571428571 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213149773665 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900291205249 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638296806571 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159561691063 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357251640414 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.