Many people put their personal information online address telephone number and so on for purposes such as signing up for social networks or online banking Is this a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

Many people put their personal information online (address, telephone number, and so on) for purposes such as signing up for social networks or online banking.
Is this a positive or negative development?

Nowadays people are using different social network sites and online banking facilities for which they need to provide their personal information. Some people contemplate that it may have negative impact whereas I believe that providing cofidential information is beneficial as it as safety guard for them to prevent from fraudulent activity and it makes the applications and website more user friendly for them.
The personal details provided on websites is fruitfuls as it acts create an alert for consumer if any suspicious activity occurs on their accounts. When their phone number is linked to their social networking site, if soemone tries to access it, the company will send a message to user to inform that unkwon user is trying to get access to their account. As a result, it avoids privacy breach of customers.
Another point to consider is that by adding personal data on the baking sites make it easier for the citizens to use these applications. Sometimes people do not remember their account numbers, while visiting online if the address or phone number is associated they can simply type in that and their account will open for them and can make any kind of changes for them and do not need to conatct customercare in order to make changes to their accounts, they can customise it in settings.
To conclude what have discussed so far, if some of the persoanl details are available online there is no harm in that as it is for the safety and convinence of the people. If something unusal activity occurs they can always report to the company and it can be taken care of.

Votes
Average: 4.5 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-02-06 thuylinh15 89 view
2021-04-02 Harman Shergill 45 view
Essays by user Harman Shergill :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he address or phone number is associated they can simply type in that and their a...
^^
Line 4, column 43, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... conclude what have discussed so far if some of the persoanl details are available online t...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, whereas, while, kind of, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1306.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80147058824 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52049342604 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525735294118 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 272.0 20.2975951904 1340% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1306.0 106.682146367 1224% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 272.0 20.7667163134 1310% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 49.0 7.06120827912 694% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301331422133 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.301331422133 0.084324248473 357% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18277916051 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630148415366 0.056905535591 111% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 137.2 13.0946893788 1048% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -204.6 50.2224549098 -407% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 109.4 11.3001002004 968% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.04 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 20.96 8.58950901804 244% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 59.0 9.78957915832 603% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 110.8 10.1190380762 1095% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 59.0 10.7795591182 547% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.