Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is widening as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer. What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be taken to address those problems?
Once the world progresses, the gap between the two classes in society becomes wider and wider because the rich are wealthier and the poor are living on the breadline. Subsequently, various impacts are caused by income inequality, and some suggestions to alleviate this circumstance will be substantiated in the following essay.
Wealth concentration within a handful of individuals or institutions might result in two major issues. First and foremost, it leads our society to become the breeding ground for social unrest and political instability. Those who live in poverty may suppose it would be unfair in many aspects of life when compared to the rich. For example, the wealthy could be a principal force of hindrance to their occupational and service opportunities, whereas the poor do not receive any chances to overcome hardship. Secondly, the serious issue that has gained concern among humans is the crime rate. As poverty restricts the capacity of the underprivileged to access services and other life-sustaining necessities such as electricity bills, tuition fees, living costs, food consumption, etc., As a result, they intend to resort to violence and opt for the life of criminals.
To narrow this gap in the walks of life, there are several initiatives to reduce the unfairness caused by economic inequality, including progressive taxation and minimizing the costs for the poor in daily life. For example, the products that are bought by the rich should be levied a tax, which could lower the amount of inequality in society. On the other hand, the authorities had better invest the budget to supply the free services and products as well for those struggling to make a living. Although it cannot be denied that the current system places much importance on individual competence to determine the amount of money one might earn, the unskilled workforce, who are usually from the lower class, should be provided enough to live sufficiently.
In conclusion, chaos and the acceleration of crime rates are the two severe repercussions of the unequal distribution of wealth; and governments could impose heavy taxes on the rich and raise the minimum amount of salary for the disadvantaged.
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 89
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 89
- The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 89
- The influence of human beings on the world s ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of biodiversity What are the primary causes of the loss of biodiversity What solutions can you suggest 89
- Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15 while others require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school What are the benefits of each system Which do you think is a better educational system 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e substantiated in the following essay. Wealth concentration within a handful of...
^^^
Line 2, column 784, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, living costs, food consumption, etc., As a result, they intend to resort to vi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1849.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22316384181 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98525561606 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59604519774 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.2475170742 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.230769231 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2307692308 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137706568611 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480792250399 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402450177977 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867835256456 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332264673329 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.