In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there. What is your opinion about this?
Across the globe, cities are getting overcrowded due to the ease of earning money. Because of that, many cities are exploring places to build new housing. One of the standard solutions city officials is exploring nearby countryside housing development to accommodate the new working class of people of the cities. I agree that building new houses are necessary to accommodate the rising population of the cities.
To a certain extent, it makes sense to develop nearby countryside area, as we all know due to higher population in the cities, pollution levels are rising at a faster pace. It is also polluting surrounding areas. Hence, farms located near cities are not able to get sufficient crops. The primary reason behind not getting expected crops is less fertile land affected by cities' carbonization.
Some of the cities have already tried saving countryside by taking significant steps, but as a result, they still got abended villages located near cities. Vastly population of villages moved to further far from cities to other villages, or they changed their profession and moved to the cities for better income of source. While moving out, they left vacant lands behind on sale. For example, a village called Clarkston near the metro Detroit area became a ghost village after the massive population of residents moved out and left their lands on sale. Eventually, that situation forced county officials to allow the lands on sale for commercial development.
In conclusion, for a better quality of city citizens life, it is in everybody's favor to allow residential development in the countryside. At last, it is a win-win situation for countryside residents and the city population.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-23 | hitakshi patel | 61 | view |
| 2023-02-05 | ielts_tony | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-05 | ielts_tony | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-18 | shadow1222 | 61 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | Niharika rani | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 371, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cities'' or 'city's'?
Suggestion: cities'; city's
... crops is less fertile land affected by cities carbonization. Some of the cities ha...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 393, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... land affected by cities carbonization. Some of the cities have already tried sa...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...nd affected by cities carbonization. Some of the cities have already tried saving countr...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 661, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nds on sale for commercial development. In conclusion, for a better quality of c...
^^^
Line 4, column 45, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...onclusion, for a better quality of city citizens life, it is in everybodys favor to allo...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18613138686 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78788403728 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580291970803 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6818803014 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7333333333 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128636528019 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483978148557 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596082879192 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0827598616062 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650720215325 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.