In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there.
What is your opinion about this?
It has been noticed that the lack of land has made the constructors move to the outskirts and develop new buildings over there. Some of the people oppose to it and personally believe in protecting the countryside. I strongly agree with this view and have added my argument below paragraphs.
To start with, the areas that are far away from the cities are considered to be free from pollution, so if we construct more dwellings over there it will contaminate the freshwater as well as the air. For example, when the number of houses increases, the number of people will also increase which in relation will also increase the use of facilities, vehicles, and spread of waste which will directly or indirectly contaminate the surrounding environment. Hence, the higher the residence, the higher will be the pollution. Even more, an increase in digits of shelters will reduce the place for the children to play outside. It is always evident that the areas that are fixed for the children's curriculum activities are always sacrificed to build new homes which later live no place for children to engage themselves in outdoor play. Therefore, having new houses will make the children give away their right to play.
Furthermore, the lesser the accommodation, the higher will be the connections between the people. It is observed that the people living in the surrounding area less, then it will encourage people to set up more social gatherings and conduct events that will make all the humans connect and know each other in a better way. So, less home will always help the individual to socialize easily.
On the contrary, having more houses work as a way to expand the countryside and enhance the development over there. Making new accommodations will encourage bringing new facilities to the outskirts
like new buses, technology, better equipment, and so on which will not only make the life of the people easy but also will help them develop and stay in parallel with the people from the town. Hence, the development of new dwellings will help the people from the outskirts to develop and grow.
To conclude, fewer houses support the purity of the environment, enhance a child's growth, and improve social bonds, but it prohibits people stay on par with the people from cities.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-07-23 | hitakshi patel | 61 | view |
2023-02-05 | ielts_tony | 73 | view |
2023-02-05 | ielts_tony | 73 | view |
2022-01-18 | shadow1222 | 61 | view |
2021-10-27 | Niharika rani | 78 | view |
- it is important to construct common areas such as parks playgrounds and squares in all towns and cities do you agree of disagree
- Miss Barrett an English speaking woman who lives in your town has advertised for someone who could help her in her home for a few hours a day next summer how you could help her in her home Why you would like to do this work Explain when you will be availa
- Plastic bags plastic bottles and plastic packaging are bad for environment What damage does a plastic do to the environmet What can be done by government and individual to solve this problem 56
- Everyday many species of plants and animals are declining Offer the reason for the situation and some solution to it 56
- The cost of international travel is decreasing and tourism is increasing in many countries What are the advantages and disadvantages of the raising trend of tourism 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...s and develop new buildings over there. Some of the people oppose to it and personally beli...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bringing new facilities to the outskirts like new buses, technology, better equip...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, then, therefore, well, for example, as well as, on the contrary, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1904.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95833333333 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6755984452 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505208333333 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.7549998182 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194143724702 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671048863979 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508477762274 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104765173744 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440891710911 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...s and develop new buildings over there. Some of the people oppose to it and personally beli...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bringing new facilities to the outskirts like new buses, technology, better equip...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, then, therefore, well, for example, as well as, on the contrary, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1904.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95833333333 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6755984452 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505208333333 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.7549998182 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194143724702 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671048863979 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508477762274 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104765173744 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440891710911 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.