Many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there.
What is your opinion about this?
In today’s growing world, new accommodations are required, but unfortunately, there is no land available in urban areas and only possible to build houses in ruler areas. However, it is argued that homes should not be built in the countryside to protect them significantly. I agree with this statement and believe that to protect the economy and environment, it is necessary that people should not build their houses in ruler areas. This essay will first discuss how people can damage ruler areas after building homes and then talked about how wildlife adversely affected by the construction of building in ruler areas, followed by a reasoned conclusion.
Developing human life in the countryside by building house allow people to destroy the regular natural life cycle. To build house people need to cut trees as well as damage agricultural land to build their house which adversely affects the environment. Moreover, people who are living near the river at ruler areas play a vital role in its contamination by not only washing their clothes but also by disposing of their waste in the river. For Instance, The famous ruler area of India, Malnath was damaged 50 % after people start building their resident and start living theirs by contaminating its river and cutting their trees.
In addition, the wildlife gets disturbed if the human lives involved in their daily routine. Such as when people construct their home in the countryside they need to cut trees which are homes for wild birds. Moreover, people kill the animal not only for food but also protect themselves from scary wild animals in the ruler, as a result, they break the biological cycle and wildlife become extinction for our future generations, but the countryside is a significant area for natural species. For example, According to the survey of African ruler areas, 30% of wildlife was killed by people to build and make their houses safe.
In conclusion, It has been proved that residents in the ruler areas play a major role to damage their land, river and also wildlife. The one way to protect them is by not building a house in the countryside.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | mohammadras | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | royamoradi | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | royamoradi | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | sohailahmad | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | abcd1234 | 73 | view |
- Many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there. What is your opinion about this? 73
- Some people say that parents should encourage their children to take part in organised group activities in their free time. Others say that it is important for children to learn how to occupy themselves on their own,Discuss both these views and give your 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 505, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ruler area of India, Malnath was damaged 50 % after people start building their r...
^^
Line 7, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot building a house in the countryside.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1780.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6788876802 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497191011236 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.0983609092 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.142857143 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253168783614 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105661870584 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606649183762 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164328612285 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664863923586 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.