Money should be spent on creating new public buildings such as museums or town halls rather than renovating the existing ones.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is no doubt that governments should utilize funds for the well-being of the citizens of the country. Some individuals believe that resources should be directed towards constructing new public buildings such as museums or city halls, rather than renovating the existing ones. I completely disagree with this view. In my opinion, government should focus on renovating the existing structures as these may have a historical significance and public sentiment attached to it and may be cost efficient. In this essay, I will support my opinion with examples.
First and Foremost, many of the old structures may have a historical story to it's existence. This is because, most of them were built by ancestors which showcases their culture and traditions. To cite an example, the TajMahal in India, which is one of the Seven Wonders of the World, was built by Shah Jahan, in the loving memory of his beautiful wife. Hence, governments should invest in protecting and improving such monuments as they may be a source of tourist attraction. In other words, old structures are valuable source of history and may help the government raise revenue.
Secondly, building new museums or community halls requires not only manpower but also materials such as cement, steel, equipment etc. The cost of such materials required is huge and increasing on daily basis. This is because of inflation that impacts all countries over the world. To illustrate, concrete for one bag in the past was 10 INR. However, today it costs 45 INR. Hence, construction costs may be huge. As a result, renovation is likely to help the governments invest excess funds in developing other important areas such as rods. In short, renovation may help government in utilizing funds in other required areas also.
To conclude, I firmly believe that, governments should investment funds in renovating old buildings as this may be of historical nature and cost of renovation may be less expensive when compared to constructing a new structure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-13 | dsouza_shauna | 56 | view |
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justifies while others think it is unfair.Discuss both views. 73
- Money should be spent on creating new public buildings such as museums or town halls rather than renovating the existing ones.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an efficient manner" with adverb for "efficient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...t that governments should utilise funds in an efficient manner. Some individuals believe that resource...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 454, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s a result, renovation is likely to help the governments invest excess funds in d...
^^
Line 5, column 625, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... utlising funds in other required areas also. To conclude, I firmly believe that,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, in short, no doubt, such as, as a result, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13622291022 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85089395696 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557275541796 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.3884383853 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3157894737 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15789473684 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20677673367 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594495886006 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874716676531 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138664121594 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084210790216 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.