More and more companies allow their employees to work from home or remotely rather than going into an office each day Do the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages

Essay topics:

More and more companies allow their employees to work from home or “remotely” rather than going into an office each day.

Do the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages?

Nowadays, working from home is allowed by a growing number of corporations more than working from the premises. Although there are benefits associated with working remotely, some drawbacks arise as well, but I strongly advocate that the advantages exceed the disadvantages.

One of the significant merits of working from home is that employees would save time and money. In other words, when people work from home, they may not waste time and spend money each day due to going to work premises. Another advantage of working from home is that it might be a cheaper method for corporations. Since renting or owning a working premise will not be necessarily required. That is why working from home is advantageous for both employees and companies.

On the other hand, firstly, working from home could affect the efficiency of the performance of the employees. If there will not be strict management, which supervises the employees well, this will lead to undesirable repercussions to the performance. Hence, firm managers are significantly required as long as the company allows working remotely. Secondly, working remotely may impact the communication and work environment between the workmates because they will not treat each other face to face but online or over the phone. Therefore, working from home has a detrimental effect.

In conclusion, working from home is a modern approach and preferred by many employers currently. Although it is beneficial to employers and employees, it is needful to overcome its cons but I think that the drawbacks are overshadowed by the benefits.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-02-14 amat_96 87 view
2020-11-29 Eslam Mobarak 61 view
2020-11-08 Sumitkoch85 73 view
2020-11-07 Sumitkoch85 73 view
2020-11-06 Sumitkoch85 78 view
Essays by user Eslam Mobarak :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, i think, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27165354331 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96640676562 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566929133858 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4677459403 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6428571429 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310271885494 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11694544708 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732591291148 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182126870893 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711735549467 0.056905535591 125% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.