More and more people no longer read newspapaer or watch TV programs to get news. They get news about the world through the Internet. Is this a positive or negative development?
In modern era, internet has become more popular to get news throughout the world. Fewer people read newspapers or watch news on TV. This is a positive change and this will be discussed in following paragraphs.
Firslty, traditional ways of getting news like newspaper needs paper and for that lots of trees cut down annually, which is environmentlly unfriendly. Internet helps to reduce the demand of newspaper and this may lead to less demand of paper. Ultimately, this may reduce the damage to the woodlands. Moreover, it may be bit difficult to carry newspaper eveerywhere. But internet provides an opportunity to read enewspaper anywhere and anytime through electronic gadgets like smartphones. Furthermore, sitting infront of TV to watch news is luxury for many people thesedays as they may have very tight schedules and watching news on mobilephones while travelling or in office may be very convenient.
However, reading newspaper may give a satisfaction for many people. For example, many adults specially elderly like to read newspaper in the morning while having a sip of tea in the balcony or garden of their homes. Digital platform may not provide that comfort and relaxing feeling. This may be the same with the watching TV for news such as sitting on the couch or sofa infront of TV set and drinking tea or coffee with the evening snacks may have a different feeling for many which they may not get through mobilephones. Additionally, digital plateforms such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram may spread fake news means these may be less reliable as compare to newspapers.
In conclusion, this may be true that internet has changed the people's preference that how to get news and this is a good development for environment and for individuals, despite of having some good points of traditional ways of getting news.
- In some countries older people who retire from work spend the money on themselves e g holiday rather than save money for their children Is this a positive or negative development 79
- some countries have spent a large amount of money on bicycles Why has this happened Is it the best way to solve traffic problems 56
- You come to know about a piece of equipment that would help you at your workplace Write a letter to your manager In your letter describe the equipment explain how it might be helpful at your workplace offer help in purchasing it 89
- You use the local swimming pool often and during one of your visits you have encountered a problem Write a letter to the manager In your letter describe what the problem was What the swimming pool staff have done about it Suggest your own solution to the 92
- Many people today put personal information online for the needs of daily lives e g shopping banking and social network Is it a positive or negative development 95
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: Fewer
...pular to get news throughout the world. Less people read newspapers or watch news on...
^^^^
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...r that lots of trees cut down annually. Which is environmentlly unfriendly. Internet ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 63, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...y be true that internet has changed the peoples preference that how to get news and thi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07284768212 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87459941281 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529801324503 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.7514478603 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.75 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300252677504 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104117634936 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100052018615 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245162137158 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112422203832 0.056905535591 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: Fewer
...pular to get news throughout the world. Less people read newspapers or watch news on...
^^^^
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...r that lots of trees cut down annually. Which is environmentlly unfriendly. Internet ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 63, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...y be true that internet has changed the peoples preference that how to get news and thi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07284768212 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87459941281 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529801324503 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.7514478603 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.75 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300252677504 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104117634936 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100052018615 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245162137158 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112422203832 0.056905535591 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.