In most countries multinational companies their products are becoming more and more important This trend is seriously damaging our quality of life Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

In most countries multinational companies, their products are becoming more and more important. This trend is seriously damaging our quality of life
Do you agree or disagree?

Multinational corporations and their products are becoming increasingly indispensable all over the globe. But in the meantime, whether it is a blessing or a curse has sparked a heated debate that this trend can cause serious damage to our quality of life. In my point of view, I partially agree with this statement.

On the one hand, some global products do not worth the price. Because of the mindset that national brands are always better, companies have boosted their products’ prices. The products also have good packaging and are strongly promoted. We can easily see the difference between the makeup remover wipes. The local has a much cheaper price than the global even though the qualities are still the same. We always have to pay for the trademark instead of the quality.

On the other hand, global products tend to go with high quality. To be sold globally, each country has to produce its products with the most modern technology. Because of that, its top quality is indisputable. For example, German housewares are known for their durability. They can be used for nearly a hundred years without being broken. It clearly determines the quality assurance and the improvement in daily life.

Altogether, I agree that the popularity of national products may partially affect our life. However, it is undeniable that the products which go with the high quality are improving our daily life. In that case, we should make a balance between local and global goods in order to balance our life.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-08-01 qaengx 56 view
Essays by user qaengx :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'cheaper' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: cheaper
...eup remover wipes. The local has a much more cheaper price than the global even though the q...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, as to, for example, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1264.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99604743083 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63610584751 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573122529644 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.9916652773 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.2222222222 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0555555556 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27777777778 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317216060171 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804248295479 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596968511303 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178531642812 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733101018397 0.056905535591 129% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.0946893788 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.