In many cases, the interview is the last hurdle for an applicant to clear before landing a job. Interviews probably aren’t a foolproof method of selecting candidates; however, I can’t suggest any better alternatives.
An employer cannot fully assess a candidate's capabilities, personality, or character during an interview. Because several personality development centers now prepare applicants for interviews by teaching them to answer the questions that are frequently asked questions. With this result, sometimes, a candidate who possesses fruitful knowledge with better qualifications may fail to get jobs because of his or her poor performance in the interview. However, I do not think that interviews should be done away with. Employers all over the world use this selection process to find skillful candidates. This is a clear indication that interviews are an efficient method of selecting good candidates.
In my opinion, interviews should not only be the criteria for selecting applicants. They should be used in conjunction with written examinations during which a candidate's proficiency in various subjects can be assessed. In addition, candidates should be asked to participate in debates or group discussions. Their real personality and leadership skills will come to the fore during these events.
To conclude, the interview is not a flawed recruitment process, but it is not a perfect process but it had more merits than demerits for hiring candidates for the jobs. In fact, when interviews are used in conjunction with other alternative methods such as personality tests, they will definitely help businesses find the best candidates.
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from 73
- Your friend is in another country Write a letter to your friend asking for advice about employment opportunities in his country In your letter you should say why you want to work there what skills and work experience you have inquire about details such as 87
- You visited a town last month and told your friend that you would like to meet However you could not make it Write a letter to your friend In your letter you should express your apology why you could not meet making arrangements to meet him 78
- You are going to another country to study You would like to do a part time job while you are studying so you want to ask a friend who lives there for some help Write a letter to your friend In your letter give details of your study plans explain why you w 84
- Some students take one year off between finishing school and going to university in order to travel or to work Do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'candidates'' or 'candidate's'?
Suggestion: candidates'; candidate's
...ith written examinations during which a candidates proficiency in various subjects can be ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hiring candidates for the jobs. In fact, when interviews are used in conjunction ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, in addition, in fact, such as, in many cases, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59683794466 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18529503407 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620553359684 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2613494558 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.142857143 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188619610322 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682637458086 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451915369463 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113070042112 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055889371655 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.