Most large companies nowadays operate multi-nationally. To what extent do multinational companies have responsibilities toward local communities in which they operate?
There is a controversial issue about the role of international corporations in the development of regional societies. Some politicians say that they play a major role in the growth of areas where they operate, while some economists believe that they bring no benefit to them. In this essay, I will consider both points of view and agree with the idea of their contribution to local societies.
Let us start with the reasons why some politicians state that transnational businesses take obligations for local society where they do business. The first reason is that they provide employment for locals. International companies usually employ people from regional community, so more residents both get a job for a long time with all advantages, including insurances and normal holidays. Another reason is that they participate in social programs. This type of organization, for instance, frequently devote money to various charity campaigns, such as building new schools and providing households with free housing, which improve the quality of life in regions.
However, some economists argue that multinational companies take no responsibilities for the local communities. Firstly, they pay unequal salary. Multinational companies are prone to open branches in developing countries, so that they can recruit people with high competency, but with lower wage expectations. However, this often results in social unrest, as the local staff wants payment equality as in the headquarter. Secondly, they tend to avoid full taxation. They use different illegal schemes, such as bribing governors, to avoid entire taxation, which leads to a great deficiency in the budget of the host country and little development of community.
In conclusion, even though some economists claim that transnational are irresponsible for regional development, I think that they improve the standards of life the local area where they work.
- You would like to participate in (join, take part in) a work-related seminar(IT seminar) in another country (England).Write a letter to the person in charge of the seminar and ask for detailed information regarding the dates, program, accommodation and co 78
- Scientists believe that computers will become more intelligent than human beings. Some people find it a positive development while others think it is negative development.Discuss both points and give your own opinion 73
- Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines.Should parents be made by law to immunise their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunise their children? 78
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of using CCTV cameras to fight crime? 78
- Some people think the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 278, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y employ people from regional community, so more residents both get a job for a l...
^^
Line 7, column 405, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ocal staff wants payment equality as in the headquarter. Secondly, they tend to avoid full taxa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55102040816 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1088360946 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598639455782 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1349168423 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.8 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158657782332 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556566310254 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039581878244 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0965023809519 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439097066704 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.