Most modern families have both parents working and as a result children spend less and less time with their parents. What is the reason for this? What problems can this cause?

In the today’s dynamically changing world, mothers and fathers forced to work both. As a result, their children suffer from a lack of parents’ attention. This essay will discuss the major reason for this and predict difficulties according to this issue.

Lack of money is often mentioned as the leading factor that persuades parents to work both. Undoubtedly, many unanimously would argue that families with one working person have serious problems with growing up children because of a shortage of money. Take my family as an example. Unless my parents did not work both, we were not able to afford such things like sport classes and computer for studying. However, working both, they provided all these things for children. Thus, it is clear that for certain families, both working parents are compulsory chose in order to provide a better life for families.

Drug addiction and juvenile delinquency are just two of the many problems that might be a result of both working parents. As soon as parents do not spend enough time with children, youngsters might be impacted by other people such as drug addiction teenagers. My personal experience of both working parents has let to such type of people. However, having an older brother who understood this situation better helped me to avoid negative consequences in this situation. Therefore, spending less time with children because of work, parents could do not protect their kids from illegal substances and negative people around kids.

In conclusion, as the above shows, the lack of money for many people is the main cause of both working parents. As a result, many children suffer from a shortage of paying attention from parents that might tend to socialize with negative people at school.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13541666667 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59996652029 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569444444444 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6174969307 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4375 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3125 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402023318419 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123541981791 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451353085553 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234825893897 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532649601413 0.056905535591 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.