Most scientific inventions and discoveries are worthless and only waste time and money resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your own opinion.
In this fast paced life, nobody would deny that it's all possible due to the inventions that has taken place in last few decades. However, some people still urge that innovations and inventions are not productive and is time Consuming. In my opinion, inventions are the bliss to us and I do not agree with the said mentions.
Being a part of fastest growing era, I would emphasize on the importance of scientific discoveries. Although, these inventions involve huge amount of time and money resources, still it could not be neglected that the positives are having long term benefits. For example the nuclear power invention. The nuclear power was not invented for wars and destructions but it was having more beneficial obligations. Today no country could imagine to attack any Nation having nuclear resources. Hence it is simple and clear that these discoveries have helped economies to stand firm without the neighbouring fears.
On contrary, some opine that due to immense expenses involved, these inventions waste time and money both. To some extent, we need to accept that innovation requires good research and development and it takes time. The results come after a decade's some time but become fruitful for the coming years. For instance, metro trains run below the road surface level and it involved large number of years to build train lines underneath. Today, no one would stand against the usefulness of metro trains as they took time but it has certainly helped in reducing traffic congestion.
In conclusion, great minds are involved in large number to make this inventions beneficial for us. Hence it takes time and a lot of investment is required. In my opinion, the benefits outweigh the negatives of the discoveries. Needless to say, the comfortable lifestyle that we dwell in, is the result of one if the inventions only which took certain time to fulfill our demands.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-11 | Urvashi Singh | 97 | view |
- Some people think that it is the responsibility of governments to take care of the environment, while others believe that it is the responsibility of people to take care of the environment.Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Question: the performance of staff can have significant impact on the success of the company.What can companies do to increase the Staff productivity? 56
- Some people believe giving gifts to friends and family is to show them that we care. Others think that there are more important ways. Discuss both and give ur views. 78
- : A friend has written to you asking for your advice about a problem at work. You have had a similar problem at work. You have had a similar problem in the past. Write a reply to your friend. In your letter; tell your friend you understand the problem, ex 61
- Nowadays in many countries women have full time jobs. Therefore, it is logical to share household tasks evenly between men and women. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 14, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the fastest'.
Suggestion: of the fastest
...ith the said mentions. Being a part of fastest growing era, I would emphasize on the i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ck any Nation having nuclear resources. Hence it is simple and clear that these disco...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a decade' or simply 'decades'?
Suggestion: a decade; decades
...d it takes time. The results come after a decades some time but become fruitful for the c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 65, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ds are involved in large number to make this inventions beneficial for us. Hence it ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 100, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...make this inventions beneficial for us. Hence it takes time and a lot of investment i...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, still, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03503184713 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68932592559 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585987261146 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7826410117 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8333333333 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4444444444 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38888888889 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197794610925 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567656612975 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452201270853 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113263661889 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0160501850283 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.