News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures. some people say that these pictures are more effective than words. What is your opinion about this?
Nowadays, with the invent of technology, ways of broadcasting information through TV and Newspaper have been changed. It is believed by a section of people that pictorial approach of news is very attractive and informative than other methods. In my opinion, this method is more effective and I'll support my view and give valid arguments with examples.
To begin with, there is no denying the fact that pictures attract the attention of the audience. They also give the basic understanding about the news story to reader’s and thus help them to figure out which stories are worth mentioning their attention. In this age of information explosion, we receive the updates every second and it is juggernaut task to read or watch all of the stories that we come across. Pictures play the vital role to filter out the stories we are not interested in. To illustrate, As I am a great fan of Sachin Tendulkar, whenever I see an image on the screen or in the newspaper then it makes me more curious to read the full story. It is his photo which grabs my attention.
Furthermore, By adding more pictures to news articles, news editor attract the attention of children as well as illiterate people. Because it is difficult for this group to understand a particular topic without the presence of pictures. Special sections and supplements are published and broadcasted by the press media to attract the attention of this particular group. Moreover, It also leads to creating the various new employment opportunities in the sector of animation and graphics design.
In conclusion, I reckon that including pictures in news can play a pivotal role in gaining the reader’s attention to a particular topic. Pictures can also tell a story more vividly and make comprehension easier.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | Kaupo199 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | amanda.mosby | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | berryabhisheksn | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | mansoureh | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-31 | PK_18 | 56 | view |
- Most people accept that we now live in a globalized world but not everyone agrees that this is beneficial. To what extent is globalization a positive or negative development? 78
- Most people accept that we now live in a globalized world but not everyone agrees that this is beneficial. To what extent is globalization a positive or negative development? 89
- Some people say that parents should control their children behavior from a very young age. what do you think? 73
- Most people accept that we now live in a globalized world but not everyone agrees that this is beneficial To what extent is globalization a positive or negative development 88
- Leisure is a growing industry but people no longer entertain themselves as much as they used to because the use of modern technology has made them less creative Do you agree and disagree 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
Nowadays, with the invent of technology, ways of broadcasting inf...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 293, Rule ID: ILL_I_LL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I'll'?
Suggestion: I'll
...nion, this method is more effective and Ill support my view and give valid argument...
^^^
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... it is juggernaut task to read or watch all of the stories that we come across. Pictures p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, then, thus, well, i reckon, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01683501684 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94197109341 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3515949977 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3333333333 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241473974513 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690163947174 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420325226183 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135070407795 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334662644151 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.