News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures. Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words. What is your opinion about this?
Many news coverages broadcasted on TV or published in newspaper usually has photographs attached. It is believed by many that these visuals have better impact than the words. I completely agree with this opine as pictures are more informative than words and people can understand news quickly compared to going through the passages.
First of all, photos contain plethora of information about the incident or any situation. One can not only capture ‘what’ about the news but can also grasp possible ‘how’ or ‘why’ about the news as well. For example, when a player or a team becomes victorious in a game, we see our newspapers and TV are full of pictures as this way audience can better capture emotions as well as news about the event. Moreover, these still visuals are quite interesting and attractive. A clear illustration to this is how newspapers publish special weekly editions specifying for kids are eye-catching and eventually they help them to read and focus more in study.
Secondly, in this fast paced life people has got limited time to spend on staying informed about what’s happening around. They don’t have luxury to read line by line to follow the news. In addition to that they find it very boring that a short piece of news has so much verbiage attached to it. In these scenarios pictures serve in the best way as one can get gist from them without looking at words. Furthermore, one can determine from the picture itself that the news would be interesting or not. Therefore, people prefer to go through images first to save their time and yet to get maximum useful information.
In conclusion, I completely agree with the opinion that images are much effective than words. These still visuals speak much more information than words and it also serves as a time saver for anyone in this busy lifestyle.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | Kaupo199 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | amanda.mosby | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | berryabhisheksn | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | mansoureh | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-31 | PK_18 | 56 | view |
- Some feel executives in large companies should receive high salaries while others think they are paid too much compared to ordinary workers Discuss both views and give your own opinion 91
- You work at home and have a problem with a piece of equipment that you use for your job Write a letter to the shop or the company which supplied the equipment In your letter Describe the problem with the equipment Explain how this problem is affecting you 73
- large company in your area has decided to spend a certain amount of money either to sponsor a local children s sports team for two years or to pay for two open air concerts It has asked for feedback from the general public Write a letter to the company In 89
- Some believe that advances in technology are increasing the gap between rich and poor while others think the opposite is happening Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 89
- Governments in many countries have recently introduced special taxes on foods and beverages with high levels of sugar Some think these taxes are a good idea while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96485623003 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80907170628 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565495207668 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8191844525 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.125 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5625 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297374306507 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908277950078 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445926349321 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187841346683 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337876755394 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.