News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures
It is widely accepted in television and newspaper medium that pictures provide more details than words. Due to this most of the news stories are accompanying with images. Several people believe that pictures are more efficient in conveying the context than words. I strongly agree on this statement, in this essay I will support the argument with valid examples.
First and foremost, there are people who reads newspaper because of pictures. More than words, they are highlighter or attention seeker to get the focus from the readers. Furthermore, even illiterate people can understand the news or message by seeing the pictures which give plethora of information. Secondly, news channels prefer to describe the news stories using pictures, because to compete with their business rivals. Additionally, to increase more subscribers and viewers. To prove that, well-known magazine conducted several surveys to understand the readers/viewers preferences and the result shows that 70% of young and old person purchase magazines if they like the front cover picture.
On the other side, some people completely disagree with the current news format. According to them certain news show and articles often come with inappropriate pictures which might influence young generations. Children are more vulnerable and easily can affect by the negative contents. Government should come up with censor board for TV channels and newspaper to restrict contents and pictures. This will protect the young students from impacts of unsuitable pictures.
To conclude, pictures offers detail information also helps to improve the media business. At the same time with help of government regulation prohibiting few pictures will increase the newspaper and TV followers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...dren are more vulnerable and easily can affect by the negative contents. Government shoul...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57677902622 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80080205256 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610486891386 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9575874731 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5882352941 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7058823529 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.29411764706 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267114894626 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753749330076 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069986688263 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154515263743 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177235453897 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.