Nowadays children prefer electronic games to other games and toys? Why is it happening? Is it a positive or negative development?
Due to the influence on children by watching TV and spending time on the Internet, electronic games have increased in popularity when compared to games and toys which require physical activity. I believe that this is a negative development as it can have many adverse effects on the younger generation.
Undoubtedly, there are some benefits of electronic games such as easy availability and lower cost. The nature of these games is that they are digital which gives them an upper hand when compared to physical traditional games or toys. Most importantly, the major benefit is that a single smartphone or smart TV can hold hundreds of games in digital format and most of them could be free. For instance, a smart TV sold by Samsung comes pre-loaded with fifty free games for kids. However, if kids would want to have the same amount of traditional games and toys, it would cost a fortune and require a huge amount of physical space.
Nevertheless, playing with other games and toys benefits in the physical development of children. Children by nature are joyful and like to be active by doing numerous things and it enables them to learn about the physical aspects of different items. It is also in the nature of kids to get bored easily, so they try to play different games which aid in their physical and mental development. In the case of electronic games, they tend to be attractive in nature and thus kids spend a lot of time playing on it but the harmful rays from the TV screen or smartphone are dangerous and result in damage to the eyes.
Furthermore, studies have shown that playing with traditional games and toys increases social skills and encourages positive behavior in kids. Children are required to interact with others and make friends which helps them in their future life. Toys and traditional games can be played in groups which results in the development and enhancement of social skills. The result of playing games either is winning or losing it, in both cases, kids learn to behave in an appropriate manner. On the other hand, lots of studies have been done on the impact of electronic devices on children and it was found that the waves emitted from these devices tamper the development of brain and kids usually confine to themselves and lose interest in interacting with other children.
In conclusion, we cannot avoid the influence of digitalization on children but efforts should be taken to minimize screen time and encourage games which require physical activities and social interaction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-19 | Prabhjot Kaur Bhullar | 84 | view |
| 2019-01-09 | insidematrix | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-09 | insidematrix | 73 | view |
- Nowadays food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live? 73
- Scientists predict that all people will choose to talk the same global language in the future.Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 73
- In some countries, most people prefer to rent their homes rather than buying them. What are the advantage and disadvantages of renting a home? 73
- It is becoming increasingly popular to have a year off between finishing school and going to university. What are the advantage and disadvantages of this? 73
- Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on individuals and the society.To what extent do you agree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 460, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an appropriate manner" with adverb for "appropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...it, in both cases, kids learn to behave in an appropriate manner. On the other hand, lots of studies hav...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 10.4138276553 269% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2105.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 428.0 315.596192385 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91822429907 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67426420014 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476635514019 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 662.4 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.8697958668 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.823529412 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1764705882 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316208220209 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115942398852 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760080139517 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186720779789 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610615118405 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.