Nowadays children spend more time playing computer games than doing sports Why is it happening Does it have a positive or negative effect on their development

Essay topics:

Nowadays children spend more time playing computer games than doing sports. Why is it happening? Does it have a positive or negative effect on their development?

These days, as we embrace the computer age, nothing would stop the daily lives of young people from engaging to electronic games rather than involving into physical activities. How true is that? In this essay, I am going to layout my views on this topic as well as the possible positive and negative influences that might affect one's development.

We all know that 20 years ago, computers have just starting to evade our lives. Computers was then a luxury, expensive and for rich only. But now it is everywhere, for the reason that it is already cheap and not only a necessity but also an accessory. Nowadays, during free time children would prefer to hold a certain gadget instead of performing an outdoor activity. They would rather prefer to play sports games on their cellphones, Xbox, PlayStations (a few to mention), rather than doing it physically. This is because computer games are very entertaining, fun and easy to use. But this should be taken partly as a positive development because when children spend a long period of time playing games on their computer, they will develop many health problems (headache, back pains) as well as behavioral problems (addictiveness, laziness). This will also make them less visible to social activities. Outdoor games are good for children for it will make them fit and stronger. Study reveals that children who play sports are healthier than those who don't. Better still, outdoor games require the participation of more than one individual. When children play games like basketball or football, they also learn several skills as they learn to share and work as a team.

As a recap, it is not hard to see that there are greater benefits in sports activities than playing computer games. And playing computer games is not totally bad. You should use it at the right place and at the right time.

Votes
Average: 4.9 (5 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-11-08 mohit883 73 view
2017-05-08 mgrajapt 84 view
2018-02-06 sherin rijo 89 view
Essays by user JuliusMichael :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 332, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...d negative influences that might affect ones development. We all know that 20 yea...
^^^^
Line 3, column 677, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ment because when children spend a long period of time playing games on their computer, they w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 807, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'problems'' or 'problem's'?
Suggestion: problems'; problem's
...dache, back pains as well as behavioral problems addictiveness, laziness. This will also...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1050, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...lay sports are healthier than those who dont. Better still, outdoor games require th...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, still, then, well, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89137380192 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57029895732 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594249201278 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.384769539078 520% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.2318980438 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0555555556 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3888888889 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 7.06120827912 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304707600768 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801854642083 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577159158363 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175555268582 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0742147169538 0.056905535591 130% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.