Nowadays entertainers get paid more than politicians What are the reasons for this Is this a negative or positive development

Essay topics:

Nowadays, entertainers get paid more than politicians. What are the reasons for this? Is this a negative or positive development?

Beyond the shadow of a doubt that artists are highly paid as compared to the politicians. A chunk of society opines that this is a much-needed change; however, others consider the same as a destructive trend. The following paragraphs would clarify my personal standpoint for the very conception.

Entertainers seem to be a welcome development. Multifarious arguments are accountable for this trend. In modern technology, entertainment is the main resource of stress buster with the development of media. For instance, the famous celebrity like John Dwayne and Vin Diesel who make the blockbuster movies by which they earn money and bring wealth for the producers. Whereas authorities aim is to earn more profit and they do not focus on the public conditions.

At the side of the coin, politicians should have more wages and salaries as compared to the comedians. If they do not satisfy with the current grade pay and they tend to commit a crime such as corruption and money laundering. In order to improve their situation, for example, many governors immigrate to foreign countries and carry stolen money with them. Furthermore, their job is very stressful. During their career time, they must be responsible for their action. If they fail, citizens blame them for their causes.

To conclude, there is a mixed bag. As, politicians have more salary as compared to an entertainer, but they are not fit for taking public responsibility which results in affecting the country's economy and wealth.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-09-15 navpreet12 56 view
Essays by user navpreet12 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ments are accountable for this trend. In modern technology, entertainment is the ...
^^
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: FAMOUS_CELEBRITY[1]
Message: Use simply 'celebrity'.
Suggestion: celebrity
...development of media. For instance, the famous celebrity like John Dwayne and Vin Diesel who mak...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, whereas, for example, for instance, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1258.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 244.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15573770492 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92195582671 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627049180328 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8950161236 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.625 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.25 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175547203258 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534619457694 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424304810366 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103082587887 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390694075639 0.056905535591 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.