As a part of urbanization, spaces in the cities are filled with concrete structures as a result of which, development are taking place in the outskirts too, new colleges, companies etc. are built distant from the city. In this scenario, travelling becomes inevitable for the people associated with it. Many people use these travelling hours effectively by number of ways while others creep on the boredom and waste of time, this idea is supported and refuted by many. Both sides of this argument will be analyzed before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.
There are numerous points to endorse my view point. Firstly, in most of the cases people who are involved in such daily practice of travelling for long hours, plan their journey wisely. For example, my friend Raj, travels total four hours to and fro, from home to office, he either watches movies, listen to songs, have a telephonic conversation etc. and use the time for entertainment or enriching own self by knowledge. Undoubtedly, when such events are regular, humans become used to that activity, same goes with travelling too. Hence it can be said how travelling for long hours does not hinder a person in any way.
However, on the other hand, there are issues linked with longer commute hours, most common is it affects our energy level as well as negatively impacts on conduction of activities. For instance, human mind can get exhausted in many situations easily, because of so much time spent on road and exposure to outdoor when finally reached at work, one is not filled with enthusiasm, especially people with older age. Nevertheless, public is bound to travel in order to earn livelihood or get education and often they oversee how it affects them mentally and physically, long journey also can cause pain in body because of one seating posture with movement. Thus it can be stated that travelling for more hours everyday will definitely affect people in negative terms.
In summary, the disadvantages associated with traveling for longer hours is more than the other. However, after analyzing both it is clear that workplace or school should be in easy reach, avoiding time spent to reach. As such it is predicted that people will become aware for this side of connection of long hours journey and their effect on them, avoiding for the same.
- The diagram below shows changes in modes of transport chosen by travellers in a Europen country from 1950 to 1990
- Some people feel that courses can make anyone a teacher while others feel an excellent teacher cannot be made by pursuing a course Discuss both view and give your own opinion 57
- Some people consider thinking about the future and planning for the future to be a waste of time They argue that people should simply live in the moment Do you agree or disagree 47
- The best way to deal with rising problem of traffic and transportation is by encouraging people to live in cities rather than in suburbs and countryside To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones has had a negative effect on young people s reading and writing skills To what extent do you agree or disagree with this 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 534, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ctivity, same goes with travelling too. Hence it can be said how travelling for long ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 653, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...e of one seating posture with movement. Thus it can be stated that travelling for mo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 706, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...e stated that travelling for more hours everyday will definitely affect people in negati...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in summary, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1930.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94871794872 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59356914703 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7573348716 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.222222222 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148661135975 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049762716342 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0298838147729 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945174142844 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169305773061 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.