Nowadays, a lot of media, including newspapers, magazines, television, radio, and even the internet, are publishing the stories of people's private lives. Should this practice be banned?
In this era, there are several means of communication including televisions, newspapers, radio, and the list goes on. With increasing competition among them, these sources are publishing people's private lives to get public attention. Yet, this way of boosting sale is not acceptable to me. Therefore, I strongly recommend the government to outright ban such practice which is against fundamental principles of life.
To begin with, the public find it amusing when media publish the private lives of politicians, movie stars and even ordinary people. As a consequence of this, more important issues such as corruption, lack of education and health problem get ignored as media is not drawing the attention of the public to these issues. So, no one comes forward to resolve these issues and country do not develop. Moreover, exposing someone life is an insult to his or her dignity. Indeed, in society, everyone whether celebrity or ordinary person has a right to enjoy full privacy without infringement. Meanwhile, no one expects that his or her story get published and become the laughing stock shared by all.
Furthermore, adolescents and adults are greater victims of such news and propaganda due to its appalling effects. This is because famous personalities such as movie stars are their role models and they intend to follow them in life. Any misleading information such as tamed photos of their role models etc. they receive from different sources can bring them at the brink of violence.
In view of the above undesirable impacts, it is reasonable to assume that the practice of printing privacy is detrimental to our social ethics. It is my earnest request to our government that such practice should be forbidden in the form of law. Moreover, the government should initiate awareness programs to educate people about the importance of privacy and its appalling effects in case of its infringements.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun means seems to be countable; consider using: 'several means'.
Suggestion: several means
In this era, there are several means of communication including televisions,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 663, Rule ID: LAUGHING_STOCK[1]
Message: Did you mean 'laughingstock'?
Suggestion: laughingstock
... her story get published and become the laughing stock shared by all. Furthermore, adolescent...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16451612903 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84574823878 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61935483871 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7368198024 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1764705882 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2352941176 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.17647058824 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182373891371 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478373743999 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462147579177 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100386882619 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629154524147 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.