In Today's world, It is thought by some that providing children with gadgets like tablets or computers will benefit their future education and career. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument with some relevant examples to support it.
There are many reasons why people might agree with the opinion of giving gadgets to students. It is a known fact that learning resources can be accessed quickly using a laptop connected to a network. Students can search for books and contents related to their studies. For example, they can refer multiple books online without searching for different books in a library. Moreover, schools keep a limited set of books for learning, while students can read many books on websites. Furthermore, They can watch video tutorials on laptop or tablets. As a result, this can make learning more interesting for them and they can remember lessons well. Thus, having a laptop or tablet can make students learning easy and fun which in turn can enhance their skill-set leading to a better career.
On the other hand, Students can have a bad impact on their studies by keeping gadgets. Firstly, they can get distracted by surfing websites not meant for them. For instance, many students spend time playing online video games or watching videos rather than using it only for learning purpose. As a result, it can become a bad habit for them to spend most of the time playing games on tablets or computer. Secondly, computer screens can affect the eyesight of children looking continuously at it. For example, I remember, I used to watch a lot of video tutorials during my school days which resulted in my weak eyesight and I got specs due to it. Thus, most of the students feel uncomfortable reading on gadgets like tablets or laptop due to its side effects on their eyes. Hence, gadgets impact students by losing their focus on studies or weakening their vision.
To conclude, I agree that modern technology is a boon for student's learning but its disadvantages cannot be ignored.
- In the past, many people had skills such as making their own clothes and doing repairs to think in the house. In many countries, skills like these are disappearing.-Why do you think this change is happening.-How far in this situation true in your country 73
- Learning English at schools is often seen as more important than learning local languages. If these are not taught, may are at risk of dying out.In your opinion, is it important for everyone to learn English? Should we try to ensure the survival of local 65
- Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person's culture and character from their choice of clothes.Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some countries encourage teenagers to have part-time job and see it as a good thing, while others disagree. Give your opinion and explain both views. 61
- News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures.Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words.What is your opinion about this? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 285, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to purpose'
Suggestion: to purpose
... rather than using it only for learning purpose. As a result, it can become a bad habit...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91228070175 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51012109471 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538011695906 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.8523618434 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.4210526316 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.36842105263 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1806564099 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634033812281 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325391572111 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119044436742 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00901227856242 0.056905535591 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.