Nowadays, many young adults find the consumption of energy drinks as a reliable way to recover from exhaustion and stress.
Is this a positive or a negative development?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience
Write at least 250 words.
Modern world has undergone an enormous change, such is the scenario that human desires have become unsatiable. Younger generations are following such a strict regime in order to accomplish their dreams, that they have underestimated the role of good health. Thus, resulting in over exhaustion and burgeoning stress levels and to cope up with same a short term resolution has come up known as 'Energy Drinks'.
With the onset of new era and introduction of so-called revolutionary drinks, being portrayed as a pacifier to stress level and enhancing energy, the primitive drinks like Nimbu Paani(Lime water) and Sharbat(Rose water) has lost its ground. Big enterprenuers and marketing companies are promoting these energy drinks and foods to attain higher revenues and generate huge profits. In addtion to this, various promotional advertisments are displayed, such that the consumers are mislead and promoted to take up these dangerous products. Redbull and Nestle Milo are two products badly trolled by scientists for its harmful effects, but yet not been banned from the any such major consumer markets.
Furthermore, humans in order to attain swifter results have started opting for these products, forgetting the after effects of these drinks sighting harmful composition. Recent studies undertaken by researchers and scienctist have proven the ill effects of these energy drinks, mainly due to the ingredients being utilised for production of these are mainly harmful chemical and have high sugar component. Serious ailments like hypertension, diabities, obesity are natural sequel to these products and evading th eeefct of primitive techniques liek yoga and meditation to deal with stress.
In conculsion, would like to reiterate the harmful effects of these chemical packed drinks, which not only are disastrous to mankind, but also evading the traditional techniques of restoring good health and high energy level.
- Nowadays many young adults find the consumption of energy drinks as a reliable way to recover from exhaustion and stress Is this a positive or a negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or 84
- Some people believe that traditional music album and single consumption is vital for the music industry On the other hand others think that digital streaming and downloading play bigger roles Discuss both views and give your opinion Give reasons for your 67
- Many people are opting for holistic medicine rather than conventional medicine as a form of treatment for incurable diseases What are the advantages and disadvantages of such practice Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from you 84
- Nowadays many young adults find the consumption of energy drinks as a reliable way to recover from exhaustion and stress Is this a positive or a negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or 84
- Many people think that modern day parents are more over protective than parents from the past To what extend do you agree or disagree with this view Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Write 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 474, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'misled'.
Suggestion: misled
... displayed, such that the consumers are mislead and promoted to take up these dangerous...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53559322034 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81744473399 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620338983051 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.1565119818 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.454545455 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8181818182 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27272727273 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0822811625549 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0314644951595 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0232058058317 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0462451099576 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254183701295 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 474, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'misled'.
Suggestion: misled
... displayed, such that the consumers are mislead and promoted to take up these dangerous...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53559322034 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81744473399 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620338983051 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.1565119818 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.454545455 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8181818182 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27272727273 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0822811625549 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0314644951595 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0232058058317 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0462451099576 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254183701295 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.