Nowadays more people are choosing to socialise online rather than face to face Is this a positive or negative development

It can not be denied by anyone that the development of technology has changed the pattern of behavior of social people. In recent ear, people are preferring more virtual socialization rather than physical. There are numerous reasons which are working behind the changes, even if, it has both positive and negative improvement.

Firstly, in modern times online interaction is more popular among people which decreases many social constraints. Due to various facilities, man or woman can express their thoughts, ideas, and emotions via texts, and messages. Secondly, different web portals such as Facebook, Twitter, Whatsapp enhance the opportunity to make a wide range of local friends, even if, they can build good friendships with foreign people, although, language is a barrier in the past, new technology has removed this obstacle. Furthermore, communication is easier nowadays, human beings can use different apps to meet with one another virtually through a video call. All of these facilities make the world smaller and change the lifestyle pattern of people.

However, these social websites help people in different ways but the negative effects are getting more intense day by day. Though people can make online overseas friends, sometimes it creates different problems, and people suffer a lot from this. Especially the teenagers are more vulnerable as they upload photos and other documents online, therefore not only the teenagers but also their families have to face difficulties. In addition, different cybercrime is happening from these social webs. For example, a hacker can hack an account for doing an unlawful act, or get some personal information.

In conclusion, technology brings changes in every sector of our life. Through technology, socialization has changed a lot but sometimes it brings danger for people, so we should be careful when we use these sites for different purposes.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...of social people. In recent ear, people are preferring more virtual socialization rather than ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43624161074 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80004150361 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640939597315 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5268245588 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164984961523 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516439559615 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605092310738 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956045714661 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720479025446 0.056905535591 127% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.