Nowadays people’s life is changing rapidly and, as a result, family relationships are affected.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Give your opinion and examples from your own experience.
We live in a life which is constantly transforming due to the advents of science and technology and in turn, we are also modifying our lifestyle, cultures, traditions and family systems. Owing to the proliferation in modernity, relationship bonds are becoming weaker. In my opinion, the detrimental effects of modern lifestyle far more than its benefits.
To embark on, the age of the 21st century is changing at a higher pace, leading to numerous egregious impacts. Firstly, modern life has become fast and over-demanding which obligates an individual to work for extra hours. Due to this, little time is spent with the family and friends which generally creates distance between them. Secondly, in order to fulfil the economic and financial requirements of the family, both the parents have to work, as a result, they opt day-cares or maids to provide assistance to their offsprings. To exemplify, according to a report by the childcare association of India, there is a 20% increase in the number of children in day-boardings from last 10 years.
Thirdly, the size of the families is reducing with time in comparison with the past. The modern approach of nuclear and single-family is followed by every individual which is a drastic step towards the isolation. Further, the lack of elderly support and guidance in the family can lead to the loss of ethics and values. For instance, a survey conducted by The Hindu revealed that 40% of the juvenile related crimes are done by children from nuclear families, due to little family attention. Thus, it is necessary to measure the repercussions before attempting any new change.
In conclusion, although technological developments are making a life of people modern and digital, in my opinion, these changes are creating generation gaps, isolation and lack of understanding among the family relations. Therefore, considering the harmful effects of modern changes some stringent steps need to taken by every individual to protect personal relationships.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-04 | Prabhjot Kaur Bhullar | 84 | view |
- Rich countries should help poorer countries when they suffer natural disasters.Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Transport delays and long journey times are a widespread phenomenon in many cities today What are the causes of this problem and how could the situation be improved 71
- Are famous people treated unfairly by the media? Should they be given moreprivacy, or is the price of their fame an invasion into their private life?Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- In many countries new houses are needed but the only space available for building them is in the countryside Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there What is your opinion about them 81
- You recently noticed a local restaurant that was offering a part-time job.Write a letter to the restaurant's manager, In your letter :-->Explain that you would like to apply for the job.-->Give some details of any relevant experience that you h 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 313, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[5]
Message: Did you mean 'take'?
Suggestion: take
...rn changes some stringent steps need to taken by every individual to protect personal...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26168224299 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03906814834 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607476635514 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3282703876 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.6 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.06666666667 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128204224536 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0369457609741 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0249537327187 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0748702553494 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0157020813087 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.