Rich countries should help poorer countries when they suffer natural disasters.Do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Rich countries should help poorer countries when they suffer natural disasters.
Do you agree or disagree?

The natural calamities can lead to destruction of infrastructure,environment and mankind. In terms of health and economic losses,low-income countries are largely affected by natural disasters, therefore to retain their prosperity and stability assistance should be provided by developed countries. I completely agree with the fact as developed countries have potential to provide financial assistance and social stability to poorer countries at the time of crisis.

Firstly, in order to overcome the loss of property and infrastructure, economic aid should be provided by rich countries to the affected nations. Moreover, without the help of wealthy powers, it is quite impossible for poorer nations to regain its lost prosperity. To exemplify, in 2013, a fatal disaster typhoon hit Philippines resulted in the massive destruction of two states of the country, now with the help of developed countries such as China, USA and Russia the destroyed states have been built again. Therefore, financial assistance from rich countries is quintessential for nature affected nations to earn livelihood and contentment.

Secondly, the social and personal help can be provided to retain the lost spirits of individuals and society. Additionally, relief measures in the form of goods,accessories and daily products should be assisted to helpless people. Furthermore, the developed nations can also help in the migration and settlement of affected families to safe places. For instance, Bangladesh recently experienced massive earthquake which left thousands of families without home, at that time authorities of China provided the assistance through their armed forces, that helped the people to move to places with safe zones. Nevertheless, it is indispensable fact that only the developed countries have the potential to give spark of development to destroyed nations.

In conclusion, it is undoubtedly true that wealthy nations should definitely provide economic and social help to the countries affected by natural calamities, as their assistance can help the poorer countries to rebuild their society and culture. In near future, helping the developing countries at time of natural crisis will not only remain a humanitarian cause but will also become mandate for rich countries.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-16 Reena93 78 view
2019-05-26 Prabhjot Kaur Bhullar 67 view
2019-02-14 Neelam Macwan 84 view
Essays by user Prabhjot Kaur … :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 65, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , environment
...an lead to destruction of infrastructure,environment and mankind. In terms of health and eco...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , low-income
.... In terms of health and economic losses,low-income countries are largely affected by natur...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , accessories
...ly, relief measures in the form of goods,accessories and daily products should be assisted t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 581, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orces, that helped the people to move to places with safe zones. Nevertheless, it...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1941.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69208211144 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31567693003 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49853372434 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 602.1 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4858840809 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.642857143 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3571428571 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.78571428571 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277178376506 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102793101774 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684296088567 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199662009526 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072638689811 0.056905535591 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.