Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?
Has this become positive or negative development?
Communications have become vital to each and every one in modern world. Several means of communication have been developed over the past ten years which affect human relations. These relationships have been reformed in different ways. Although technology has facilitated families interaction, which considered positive, it has a negative effect in other people’s life. Both ideas will be discussed in the following lines.
The mean time needs have forced parents to be away from their children most time of the week because of work circumstances. New contact gadgets have helped parents to monitor their children activities while they are in a different place. For example, an article which was published in New York Times shows that, the mobile phone has become the American family’s friend, which has increased the time of family gathering by 30% during the working days of the week. Thus, technology has positively affected the family relations and has made it stronger.
Despite the positive impact that technology has made in family, there is negative effect that turn out to become a cause of many problem the family. For example a recent study published in Alexandria University Wall Magazine tells that, 50% of the couples, who were introduced through the internet and got married, have failed to keep their relationship in the real world. Therefore, cyber interaction cannot provide a real knowledge of personalities.
To conclude, technology can bring people together. It also can help to increase family’s interaction which is positive but it has a negative effect of miss guiding people through inappropriate relationships which should be avoided.
- n modern times, families have become exposed to several types of challenges. These challenges are results of the rapid change of technology which has its own impact on society and family.One of these changes is the ambition of family offspring to lease it 56
- Youngsters nowadays prefer to live on their own and leave their families. Is this a positive or a negative development? 61
- Youngsters nowadays prefer to live on their own and leave their families. Is this a positive or a negative development? 56
- Increase the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extend do you agree or disagree? 73
- Being a celebrity – such as a famous film star or a sports personality – brings problems as well as benefits.Do you think that being a celebrity brings more benefits or problems? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: EACH_AND_EVERY[1]
Message: Consider using 'each one'.
Suggestion: each one
Communications have become vital to each and every one in modern world. Several means of commu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun means seems to be countable; consider using: 'Several means'.
Suggestion: Several means
... to each and every one in modern world. Several means of communication have been developed ov...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'many problems'.
Suggestion: many problems
...fect that turn out to become a cause of many problem the family. For example a recent study ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41221374046 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96147790438 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62213740458 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8479710543 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.285714286 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17970078177 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643828834458 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525298492769 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114415017118 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457183017751 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.