One way to solve the problem of congestion in cities is to build sky trains which run overhead rather than on or under the ground What are the advantages and disadvantages of using this solution to solve congestion

Traffic congestion is a serious problem facing a lot of countries. One suggestion to solve it is to build sky trains rather than undergrounds or conventional trains. While this solution has some advantages as it can be the most space efficient means of transportation, it has also some disadvantages associated.

Firstly, Sky trains are very space efficient. When cities are packed with pedestrians and cars, what people need is a means of transportation that does use the street, a means of transportation that helps them escape this congestion, and this can be attained through a sky train. A country that utilized this solution is Lebanon. If it had not been for the sky transportation in Lebanon, I believe it would have never been as clear and uncongested as it is right now.

On the other hand, overhead trains are one of the most expensive means of transportation. To build and operate a sky train, the country needs to pay enormous amounts of money. This money can be allocated for some wiser ways to solve traffic problems like building new streets or renovating the existing transportation network. In addition to this, there is a safety concern regarding overhead rail systems. It is very common among people to be afraid of sky trains or having nausea when they use them.

Henceforth, it can be confidently conveyed that Although sky trains are a smart solution to solve the problem of congestion in cities, they have also some drawbacks to consider like their cost and some safety concerns.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (10 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, regarding, so, while, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1265.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98031496063 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97027088748 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543307086614 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1080155826 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3076923077 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352310839175 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119445447152 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644039526489 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219174196958 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672330497337 0.056905535591 118% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.