The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home to work, shopping and education.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In almost all cities around the world, traffic congestion caused by cars has become a major issue. Although some people believe that reducing people's need to drive is the best way to reduce traffic congestion, I assume this is not the only or only way to solve the problem. In this article we will discuss various approaches that can be used to mitigate the problems associated with traffic.
Technological advances' ever-increasing progress makes modern society's life more convenient. Today we are not meeting spatial or time constraints with the invention of the Internet as we used to in previous eras. For instance, a businessman may execute his transaction without any trouble with one of his foreign counterparts. Likewise, students should have access to online tutorials in the comforts of their houses. At the same time, online services have given way to product buying approaches that are easier. In short, the application of technology has had a positive impact on the amount of traffic in the cities without people traveling to fulfil their daily tasks.
Nonetheless, there are other realistic approaches that can help with traffic-related issues. A typical example is the use of public transport. Officials in cities may improve the efficiency of buses or trains by increasing service quality. When drivers are willing to use these state-funded transport forms rather than private vehicles, road congestion-related issues will be minimized. One solution for the government is to lay down guidelines for citizens to use personal cars, particularly in areas where traffic is a major problem. Using cars in inner cities, for example, could be banned, and travel could only be done by public transport or cycling.
In brief, in my experience, providing people with convenient ways to allow fewer transportation might be one solution, but this method might not function alone. The government should take some steps to address this problem, such as improving public transport and roads and laying down other regulations on automobile usage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-02 | yaldaasgari | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | prabhpreet kaur | 89 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | Prachi Agrawal | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-22 | sdrocks91 | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-08 | Saira Faiz | 67 | view |
- Some people think that studying history is a waste of time while others think it is essential to learn history.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports. Why is it? Is it a positive or negative development?You should write at least 250 words. 89
- Some people think that studying history is a waste of time while others think it is essential to learn history.Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that the people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing.Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your 73
- Many people believe that university students should study a full range of subjects instead of some specific subjects To what extent do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, likewise, may, nonetheless, so, for example, for instance, in brief, in short, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3036809816 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9420696195 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616564417178 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0191304516 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.705882353 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1764705882 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58823529412 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177669693301 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505970030698 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715012082228 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107486353054 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074317670781 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.