Ordinary people try to copy famous people either reading magazines or watching TV. Why do they do this. Do you think it is good idea to copy famous people?
In the current world, a common man has the tendency to follow personalities who are famous in different fields such as film industry, sports, arts and even broadcast media. It can be different factors but mainly the way they carry around themselves. Be it the fame in respective area of work, their luxurious possessions or financial assets. Here are some of the key factors we need to think about.
One of the vital points I would like to bring forward is the money he would spend unnecessarily to lead a similar materialistic life. This would be beyond what their earnings/investments ratio is. This leads us to another aspect of the time he spends in vain for figuring out on how these celebrities live, which is a curse in the modern society. Countries like US, UK, India, Japan, China and so on have a trend of people crazily following their favorite personality shows and trying to incorporate their styles into their lives. Some among them would be Elvis Presley, Michael Jackson, Amitabh Bachchan, Bruce Lee, Jackie Chan. There are many incidents where people have tried out stunts which Bruce Lee or Jackie Chan have performed in movies. Putting their life at stake these stunts are tried out in an unsafe environment.
People tend to bother more about what these celebrities do and try hard to imitate them and forget what they could have achieved by making good use of the time and money they have. Every child has been brought up with a childhood that influences them to turn out who they are in their later stages. However, there will always be a role model in life they would look up-to. We should be able to teach our next generation to observe these personnel's inner qualities more than how they present them.
Nowadays, social media has a major role in bringing a platform for these celebrities to communicate with the people and many miss concepts that are caused by one-way communication through television and magazines are slowly being rectified. Many personalities come in midst of the common man as themselves to share their social responsibilities such as recycling, water scarcity, charity work etc. Hence having said about these valuable points I believe it is not ideal to imitate famous personnel solely on their worldly possessions.
- Nowadays people make new friends through social media networks and internet chat groups. Some think this is good. Others think that face-to-face interaction is essential. Discuss both views and your opinion. 78
- Ordinary people try to copy famous people either reading magazines or watching TV. Why do they do this. Do you think it is good idea to copy famous people? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... they carry around themselves. Here are some of the key factors we need to think about. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 270, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...cling, water scarcity, charity work are some of the common topics discussed. Hence, I belie...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11228070175 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74135031306 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652631578947 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4321149013 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0625 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8125 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 7.06120827912 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11500017469 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0361476161867 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358959380215 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0640938809343 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241759527249 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.