organized tours are choosing more and more to go to remote places and communities. Do you think this is a positive or negative development for the local people and environment?
Nowadays, humans incline more towards exploring distant and isolated places. This trend encourages tourism industry to organize tours to remote places and communities. Although employment opportunities increase for local people, undoubtedly pollution and anti-social behaviour of tourists towards local communities have more disastrous effects on environment and society.
To begin with, Organized tours to alien places bring in more job opportunities for native people. To meet the demands of tourists, restaurants and hotels increase their services, thereby jobs for waiters, cleaners and cooks increase. Moreover, more people are employed by hotels to show foreigners around areas of interests. For instance, according to a survey conducted by Times of India, 80% of Keralites are self-employed in Kerala providing guides and taxi facilities to tourists. Therefore, tourism in remote places brings in more jobs for local people.
However, there are numerous ill effects of tours organized in remote areas. Firstly, tourists show disrespect towards local cultures and traditions. They disapprove following local dress codes and do not follow rules when visiting religious places, like wearing inappropriate dresses when visiting religious temples. Secondly, the environment gets degraded when more and more tours are organized in isolated areas. Exhaust gas emissions from tourist cars and buses increase air pollution. Furthermore, plastic bags and waste disposed of by travellers on roads and green areas elevate the land pollution. For example, a report published by Hindustan Times depicts that pollution level in Shimla has risen from 2% to 15% with the increase in tourism from 2010 to 2017. Thus, tours to remote places degrade the environment and hurt religious sentiments of local people.
To recapitulate, although tourism brings in more employment for native people in the remote area, numerous demerits towards local culture have more ill effects than positive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-08 | gurinderbaghria | 86 | view |
- In many countries plastic shopping bags are the main source of rubbish causing pollution on land and in the water so people think they should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- Work for an orginisation in voilunteer 78
- organized tours are choosing more and more to go to remote places and communities Do you think this is a positive or negative development for the local people and environment 86
- Some people become famous at a young age. Is it a good or bad thing? 93
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7747440273 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80128901027 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566552901024 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.392625925 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5294117647 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2352941176 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354824059849 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12102354675 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0960797321619 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234087908881 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319035670822 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.89 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.