Some people become famous at a young age. Is it a good or bad thing?
There is no age for getting the fame. Some can attain the success at their early age in life which leads to the ranging beliefs among people’s, whether it has a positive impact or a negative impact. Although there are certain positives of this on the individual front, I believe it lays more bad impressions at society.
To begin with, Being famous at an early age of adolescence has numerous benefits at the personal level. Firstly, youth have the clear directions towards their career. This is because they are above the dilemma of selecting the vocational path that assists to sustain their bais necessities. Secondly, Multiple advertising agencies prefer to select them as the face of their product; thereby, young personalities have more financially sound at a younger age. For instance, a recent news report revealed that fresh faces in the field of advertisement are getting a comparable package to famous actors. Therefore, a healthy bank balance at initial age assists them to pursue their dreams.
However, People getting famous at a young age have more negative effects on societal front. Initially, fame resists the person to complete their studies until graduation level. This aspect will result in lesser intellectual youth in society; consequently, hampers the societal growth as a whole. Additionally, societies tend to make famous personalities as their role models. In the age of adolescence, famous pupils are not competent enough to differentiate right and wrong their one wrong deed influence the society in a negative manner. To illustrate, a survey conducted by times now depicts that 30% children in India are more inclined to drugs, listening to the rap songs of young artists.
To recapitulate, every person in the world has the dream to be famous. Although getting fame at a young age has several personal benefits such as having big bank balance and right career directions, I reckon it has a more negative impact on the society due to one’s immature nature and lesser literacy rate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 89 | view |
| 2024-06-24 | asmita acharya | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-20 | Eshovo | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-20 | Eshovo | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-18 | vishal sachdeva | 61 | view |
- In many countries plastic shopping bags are the main source of rubbish causing pollution on land and in the water so people think they should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- organized tours are choosing more and more to go to remote places and communities Do you think this is a positive or negative development for the local people and environment 86
- Work for an orginisation in voilunteer 78
- Some people become famous at a young age. Is it a good or bad thing? 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'attains'.
Suggestion: attains
...s no age for getting the fame. Some can attain the success at their early age in life ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 518, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative manner" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ir one wrong deed influence the society in a negative manner. To illustrate, a survey conducted by t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, i reckon, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14242424242 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82005314214 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581818181818 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6530688371 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8235294118 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4117647059 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.17647058824 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261575775116 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829743888383 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735569001738 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163441930754 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296296566514 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.